Universal Method for Determining Electrolyte Temperatures in Capillary Electrophoresis

Temperature increase in capillary electrophoresis (CE) due to Joule heating is an inherent limitation of this powerful separation technique. Active cooling systems can decrease the temperature of a large part of the capillary but they leave “hot spots” at the capillary ends which can completely ruin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Analytical chemistry (Washington) 2011-03, Vol.83 (5), p.1808-1814
Hauptverfasser: Evenhuis, Christopher J, Musheev, Michael U, Krylov, Sergey N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Temperature increase in capillary electrophoresis (CE) due to Joule heating is an inherent limitation of this powerful separation technique. Active cooling systems can decrease the temperature of a large part of the capillary but they leave “hot spots” at the capillary ends which can completely ruin some CE analyses despite their short lengths. Here, we introduce a “universal method for determining electrolyte temperatures” (UMET) that can determine temperatures in both efficiently- and inefficiently-cooled parts of the capillary. UMET can be applied to all electrolytes, as it does not involve any probe; it requires only measuring current versus voltage for different voltages and processing the data using an iterative algorithm. To demonstrate the universality of UMET, we measured temperatures for electrolytes of different ionic strengths as well as for different capillary diameters. We further propose a “simplified universal method for predicting electrolyte temperatures” (SUMET) which only requires one measurement of current and voltage (that can be completed in 1 min) and uses two empirical equations to predict temperatures in the efficiently- and inefficiently-cooled parts of the capillary. The equations include several instrument-specific empirical parameters that are determined using a large set of current−voltage data obtained with UMET for a range of electrolytes and different capillaries. To demonstrate the utility of SUMET, we obtained the required data set for a Beckman MDQ CE instrument and produced all required empirical parameters that enable a user of this instrument to predict the temperature for every new experimental set in a matter of minutes. We confirmed the accuracy of SUMET by measuring the temperature-sensitive dissociation rate constant of a protein−DNA complex. We foresee that UMET will be used to produce instrument-specific empirical parameters for all CE instruments and then SUMET will be routinely used for temperature prediction in CE.
ISSN:0003-2700
1520-6882
DOI:10.1021/ac103216s