Seminal plasma proteins in prostatic carcinoma: increased nuclear semenogelin I expression is a predictor of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy

Summary Semenogelins and eppin are seminal plasma proteins that form a complex and inhibit sperm motility. However, the role of these proteins in prostate cancer is poorly understood. We immunohistochemically stained for semenogelins I and II and eppin in 291 radical prostatectomy specimens. We then...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human pathology 2012-11, Vol.43 (11), p.1991-2000
Hauptverfasser: Izumi, Koji, MD, Li, Yi, MD, Zheng, Yichun, MD, Gordetsky, Jennifer, MD, Yao, Jorge L., MD, Miyamoto, Hiroshi, MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Semenogelins and eppin are seminal plasma proteins that form a complex and inhibit sperm motility. However, the role of these proteins in prostate cancer is poorly understood. We immunohistochemically stained for semenogelins I and II and eppin in 291 radical prostatectomy specimens. We then evaluated the association between their expressions in nuclei, cytoplasms, or intraluminal secretions of benign/high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia/carcinoma cells and clinicopathologic profile available for our patient cohort. Stains were positive in 32%/77%/84% (nuclear semenogelin I), 87%/94%/84% (nuclear semenogelin II), 56%/64%/37% (nuclear eppin), 7%/15%/11% (cytoplasmic semenogelin I), 6%/11%/9% (cytoplasmic semenogelin II), 68%/74%/95% (cytoplasmic eppin), 97%/98%/13% (secreted semenogelin I), 98%/97%/11% (secreted semenogelin II), and 97%/98%/48% (secreted eppin) of benign/prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia/carcinoma, respectively. The levels of nuclear semenogelin I/cytoplasmic eppin were significantly higher in carcinoma than in benign ( P < .001/ P < .001) or prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia ( P < .001/ P < .001) and in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia than in benign ( P < .001/ P = .006). Significantly higher nuclear semenogelin II expression was found in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia than in benign ( P < .001) or carcinoma ( P < .001). Significantly lower nuclear eppin expression was seen in carcinoma than in benign ( P < .001) or prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia ( P < .001). Secreted semenogelin I, secreted semenogelin II, and secreted eppin were all significantly lower in carcinoma than in benign ( P < .001) or prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia ( P < .001). There were no statistically significant correlations between each stain and clinicopathologic features except significantly lower nuclear eppin expression in Gleason score 8 or higher tumors. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests further revealed that patients with nuclear semenogelin I–positive tumor had a significantly higher risk for biochemical recurrence ( P = .046). Multivariate Cox model showed a trend toward significance ( P = .093) in nuclear semenogelin I positivity as an independent predictor for recurrence. These results suggest that nuclear semenogelin I expression could be a reliable prognosticator in men who undergo radical prostatectomy.
ISSN:0046-8177
1532-8392
DOI:10.1016/j.humpath.2012.02.008