Self-affirmation as a deliberate coping strategy: The moderating role of choice
Self-affirmation interventions, in which people write about personal values, show promise as a technique to help people cope with psychological threat. However, recent research shows that awareness of self-affirmation effects undermines them. We hypothesized that awareness attenuates self-affirmatio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental social psychology 2013-01, Vol.49 (1), p.93-98 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Self-affirmation interventions, in which people write about personal values, show promise as a technique to help people cope with psychological threat. However, recent research shows that awareness of self-affirmation effects undermines them. We hypothesized that awareness attenuates self-affirmation effects only when completion of the affirmation is externally imposed, rather than personally chosen. In two experiments, self-affirmation effects reemerged when “affirmation-aware” participants were given a choice about either whether to affirm or not (Study 1) or simply which value to write about (Study 2). These results suggest that people can learn to actively apply self-affirmation as a tool for coping with everyday threats.
► We examined whether self-affirmation can aid coping with threat if users are aware of its function. ► As in prior research, being told about affirmation's benefits and then required to affirm negated the benefits. ► However, choosing to self-affirm after learning about the benefits restored them. ► This occurred even when the “choice” was merely incidental. ► Suggests that people can be taught to self-affirm in their everyday lives. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-1031 1096-0465 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.08.005 |