Characterization of Glutathione Uptake, Synthesis, and Efflux Pathways in the Epithelium and Endothelium of the Rat Cornea

PURPOSE:To compare and contrast glutathione (GSH) uptake, synthesis, and efflux pathways in the epithelium and endothelium of the rat cornea. METHODS:Whole eyes were cryosectioned in an equatorial orientation and sections fixed in either 0.75% paraformaldehyde alone or 0.75% paraformaldehyde plus 0....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cornea 2012-11, Vol.31 (11), p.1304-1312
Hauptverfasser: Li, Bo, Lee, Monica S, Lee, Rebecca S Y, Donaldson, Paul J, Lim, Julie C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:PURPOSE:To compare and contrast glutathione (GSH) uptake, synthesis, and efflux pathways in the epithelium and endothelium of the rat cornea. METHODS:Whole eyes were cryosectioned in an equatorial orientation and sections fixed in either 0.75% paraformaldehyde alone or 0.75% paraformaldehyde plus 0.01% glutaraldehyde. Sections were then labeled with GSH, γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase (γ-GCS), cysteine, xCT, or multidrug resistance–associated proteins (MRP1, 2, 4, and 5 isoforms) antibodies and then with secondary antibodies to visualize labeling patterns. Cornea morphology was visualized using propidium iodide. Reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction was used to determine which of the 3 putative GSH transporters, NaDC3, C-terminal organic anion transporter 1 (OAT1), and/or N-terminal organic anion transporter 3 (OAT3), were present at the transcript level in the cornea. Colocalization of OAT3 and sodium dependent dicarboxylate transporter 3 (NaDC3) was performed by labeling with OAT3 and NaDC3 primary antibodies that were visualized with secondary antibodies and then mounted in 4ʼ6-diamidino-2-phenylindole to visualize cell morphology. RESULTS:Although immunohistochemical labeling showed GSH to be localized throughout the cornea, labeling for cysteine, γ-GCS, xCT, MRP4, and MRP5 was strongest in the epithelium. In contrast, although GSH labeling was strong in the endothelium, xCT and MRP labeling was absent and cysteine and γ-GCS labeling was weak relative to the epithelium. Reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction revealed OAT3 and NaDC3, but not OAT1, to be present at the transcript level. Immunohistochemical labeling showed OAT3 and NaDC3 to be localized to the endothelium but absent from the epithelium. CONCLUSIONS:The corneal epithelium and endothelium exhibit differences in GSH uptake, synthesis, and efflux pathways. The corneal epithelium seems to be the region where GSH synthesis and GSH efflux occurs. However, in the endothelium, GSH accumulation is likely to be predominantly by direct uptake of GSH from the aqueous humor.
ISSN:0277-3740
1536-4798
DOI:10.1097/ICO.0b013e31823f76bd