Direct urine analysis for the identification and quantification of selected benzodiazepines for toxicology screening
► We develop simpler and faster sample preparation method for the determination of benzodiazepines in urine. ► We overcome the problem of high cost instrumentation such as LC–MS/MS by providing similar sensitivity and specificity with other methods. ► We overcome false negative/false positive result...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences, 2012-08, Vol.902, p.42-46 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | ► We develop simpler and faster sample preparation method for the determination of benzodiazepines in urine. ► We overcome the problem of high cost instrumentation such as LC–MS/MS by providing similar sensitivity and specificity with other methods. ► We overcome false negative/false positive results when using immunoassay methods for benzodiazepines. ► The method is applicable in real clinical and forensic samples.
A simple and rapid LC/MS method with direct injection analysis was developed and validated for the identification and quantification of ten benzodiazepines (flunitrazepam, nordiazepam, diazepam, 7-aminoflunitrazepam, flurazepam, bromazepam, midazolam, alprazolam, temazepam and oxazepam) in human urine using diazepam-d5 as internal standard (IS). The main advantage of the proposed methodology is the minimal sample preparation procedure, as diluted urine samples were directly injected into LC/MS system. Electrospray ionization in positive mode using selected ion monitoring was chosen for the identification and quantification of the analytes. The linear range was 50–1000ng/mL for each analyte, with square correlation coefficient (r2)≥0.981. Interday and intraday errors were found to be ≤5.72%. The LC/MS method was applied at ten real samples found initially to be positive and negative, using immunoassay technique. Finally the results were confirmed with GC/MS. The method demonstrates simplicity and fast sample preparation, accuracy and specificity of the analytes which make it suitable for replacement of immunoassay screening in urine avoiding thus false negative/false positive results. Using this method, laboratories may overcome the problem of high cost instrumentation such as LC–MS/MS by providing similar sensitivity and specificity with other methods. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1570-0232 1873-376X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jchromb.2012.06.012 |