Direct urine analysis for the identification and quantification of selected benzodiazepines for toxicology screening

► We develop simpler and faster sample preparation method for the determination of benzodiazepines in urine. ► We overcome the problem of high cost instrumentation such as LC–MS/MS by providing similar sensitivity and specificity with other methods. ► We overcome false negative/false positive result...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences, 2012-08, Vol.902, p.42-46
Hauptverfasser: Karampela, Sevasti, Vardakou, Ioanna, Papoutsis, Ioannis, Dona, Artemis, Spiliopoulou, Chara, Athanaselis, Sotirios, Pistos, Constantinos
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:► We develop simpler and faster sample preparation method for the determination of benzodiazepines in urine. ► We overcome the problem of high cost instrumentation such as LC–MS/MS by providing similar sensitivity and specificity with other methods. ► We overcome false negative/false positive results when using immunoassay methods for benzodiazepines. ► The method is applicable in real clinical and forensic samples. A simple and rapid LC/MS method with direct injection analysis was developed and validated for the identification and quantification of ten benzodiazepines (flunitrazepam, nordiazepam, diazepam, 7-aminoflunitrazepam, flurazepam, bromazepam, midazolam, alprazolam, temazepam and oxazepam) in human urine using diazepam-d5 as internal standard (IS). The main advantage of the proposed methodology is the minimal sample preparation procedure, as diluted urine samples were directly injected into LC/MS system. Electrospray ionization in positive mode using selected ion monitoring was chosen for the identification and quantification of the analytes. The linear range was 50–1000ng/mL for each analyte, with square correlation coefficient (r2)≥0.981. Interday and intraday errors were found to be ≤5.72%. The LC/MS method was applied at ten real samples found initially to be positive and negative, using immunoassay technique. Finally the results were confirmed with GC/MS. The method demonstrates simplicity and fast sample preparation, accuracy and specificity of the analytes which make it suitable for replacement of immunoassay screening in urine avoiding thus false negative/false positive results. Using this method, laboratories may overcome the problem of high cost instrumentation such as LC–MS/MS by providing similar sensitivity and specificity with other methods.
ISSN:1570-0232
1873-376X
DOI:10.1016/j.jchromb.2012.06.012