Two-group drift-flux model in boiling flow

The two-group two-fluid model with interfacial area transport equation has been developed to improve the prediction of void fraction and heat transfer characteristics in two-phase systems. In the one-dimensional formulation, a closure relation is required for the group-1 and group-2 area-average loc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of heat and mass transfer 2012-10, Vol.55 (21-22), p.6121-6129
Hauptverfasser: Brooks, Caleb S., Ozar, Basar, Hibiki, Takashi, Ishii, Mamoru
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The two-group two-fluid model with interfacial area transport equation has been developed to improve the prediction of void fraction and heat transfer characteristics in two-phase systems. In the one-dimensional formulation, a closure relation is required for the group-1 and group-2 area-average local relative velocity. Furthermore, in the case of the modified two-fluid model with the gas-mixture momentum equation, the group-1 and group-2 void weighted gas velocities must be calculated with additional closure relations. The drift-flux general expression is extended to two bubble groups in order to describe the group-1 and group-2 void weighted gas velocities and area-averaged local relative velocities. Correlations for group-1 and group-2 distribution parameters and drift velocities are proposed and evaluated with a two-group boiling dataset taken in an internally heated annulus. The proposed distribution parameters show an average agreement within ±5%. The overall estimation of group-1 and group-2 void weighted gas velocities calculated with the newly proposed two-group drift-flux general expression shows an average agreement within ±16% of the measured value. The equations obtained for area-averaged relative velocity of group-1 and group-2 bubbles were simplified by neglecting covariance in void fraction. This assumption was compared with the experimental database and resulted in an average error within ±13%.
ISSN:0017-9310
1879-2189
DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.06.031