Time-Dependent Effects of Chlorhexidine Soaks on Grossly Contaminated Bone

OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to quantify the reduction in the bacterial burden of grossly contaminated bone segments using different chlorhexidine (CHL) solutions. We hypothesized that 4% CHL would be the most efficient decontaminate. METHODS:Fifty-four bone segments were harvested from f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of orthopaedic trauma 2012-10, Vol.26 (10), p.574-578
Hauptverfasser: Krueger, Chad A, Masini, Brendan D, Wenke, Joseph C, Hsu, Joseph R, Stinner, Daniel J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to quantify the reduction in the bacterial burden of grossly contaminated bone segments using different chlorhexidine (CHL) solutions. We hypothesized that 4% CHL would be the most efficient decontaminate. METHODS:Fifty-four bone segments were harvested from fresh-frozen porcine legs. Each specimen was dropped onto a Mueller–Hinton medium that was inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus (lux). These genetically engineered bacteria emit photons in proportion to their number, allowing for quantification. The segments were retrieved after 5 seconds of exposure. Baseline imaging provided the initial bacterial load. An equal number of specimens were soaked in normal saline (NS), 2%CHL, or 4%CHL. Specimen reimaging was completed at the 5-, 10-, 20-, 30-, and 60-minute marks. RESULTS:The average bacterial count on the bone segments were 2.18 × 10 for NS, 2.31 × 10 for 2%CHL, and 2.00 × 10 for 4%CHL. The percent reduction in bacterial counts at the 5-, 10-, 20-, 30-, and 60-minute marks were NS0%, 0%, 0%, 29.84%, 72.23%; 2%CHL93.09%, 98.16%, 99.21%, 99.63%, 99.81%; 4%CHL94.32%, 97.60%, 99.25%, 99.63%, 99.82%. At all time intervals, there was a significant difference between the 2%CHL and 4%CHL groups compared with the NS group (P < 0.0001) and no difference between the 2%CHL and 4%CHL groups. CONCLUSIONS:This study provides new data supporting the use of CHL to decontaminate grossly soiled bone segments. To maximize efficiency and decrease potential untoward effects, the authors recommend 20-minute soaks using 2% CHL for contaminated bone segments.
ISSN:0890-5339
1531-2291
DOI:10.1097/BOT.0b013e31824a3aad