A genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism-array can improve the prognostic stratification of the core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia

Core binding factor (CBF) AML with the D816 C‐KIT gene mutation demonstrate inferior treatment outcomes. However, the remaining cases without the D816 C‐KIT mutation imply a requirement of more sophisticated dissection of the patients according to their prognosis. In this study, we analyzed the prog...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of hematology 2012-10, Vol.87 (10), p.961-968
Hauptverfasser: Huh, Jungwon, Kim, Hee-Je, Jung, Chul Won, Kim, Hee-Jin, Kim, Sun-Hee, Kim, Yeo-Kyeoung, Kim, Hyeoung-Joon, Shin, Myung Geun, Moon, Joon Ho, Sohn, Sang Kyun, Kim, Sung Hyun, Lee, Won Sik, Won, Jong Ho, Mun, Yeung Chul, Kim, Hawk, Park, Jinny, Min, Woo Sung, Kim, Dong Hwan (Dennis)
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Core binding factor (CBF) AML with the D816 C‐KIT gene mutation demonstrate inferior treatment outcomes. However, the remaining cases without the D816 C‐KIT mutation imply a requirement of more sophisticated dissection of the patients according to their prognosis. In this study, we analyzed the prognostic value of a single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP‐A) based karyotyping combined with metaphase cytogenetics (MC) to facilitate further stratification of CBF AML patients. A total of 98 CBF AML patients were included and genome‐wide Human SNP 6.0 Arrays (Affymetrix) were performed using marrow samples taken at diagnosis. Overall, 40 abnormal lesions were identified in 25 patients (26%). Survival of the patients with the abnormal lesion(s) detected by SNP‐A and/or MC was worse than those without lesions in terms of the 2‐year overall survival (OS; 57.5% vs. 76.4%, P = 0.028), event‐free (EFS; 45.7% vs. 66.2%, P = 0.072), and leukemia‐free survival (LFS; 49.0% vs. 77.4%, P = 0.015), specially in the subgroup with inv(16)/t(16;16) (40.9% vs. 80.2% OS, P = 0.040) and in the subgroup without the D816 C‐KIT mutation (61.6% vs. 82.7% OS, P = 0.038). Multivariate analysis confirmed the prognostic impact of the abnormal SNP‐A and/or MC lesion on EFS (HR 2.011, P = 0.047), and LFS (HR 3.231, P = 0.005) in the overall CBF AML. This study suggests that the combined use of SNP‐A with MC in the CBF AML can provide important prognostic value, especially in the inv(16)/t(16;16) subgroup or in the patients without the D816 C‐KIT mutation. Am. J. Hematol., 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
ISSN:0361-8609
1096-8652
DOI:10.1002/ajh.23281