Single-incision apical and posterior mesh repair: 1-year prospective outcomes
Introduction and hypothesis The objective of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the Elevate Apical and Posterior single-incision mesh system (SIMS) with IntePro Lite for pelvic organ prolapse repair. Methods This prospective multicenter study included 139 women with ≥ stage II poste...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International Urogynecology Journal 2012-10, Vol.23 (10), p.1413-1419 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction and hypothesis
The objective of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the Elevate Apical and Posterior single-incision mesh system (SIMS) with IntePro Lite for pelvic organ prolapse repair.
Methods
This prospective multicenter study included 139 women with ≥ stage II posterior vaginal prolapse and/or apical descent who underwent placement of type I polypropylene mesh through a single transvaginal incision with no external needle passes. Primary endpoint was the percent of patients with posterior and/or apical stage ≤ I (“cure”) at follow-up. Secondary endpoints included, but were not limited to, rate of mesh extrusion and disease-specific quality of life outcomes.
Results
At 12 months, objective posterior wall and apical cure rates were 92.5 and 89.2 %, respectively, with an extrusion rate of 6.5 %.
Conclusions
The SIMS appears to be effective and safe in treating patients with posterior vaginal and/or apical prolapse. The risks and benefits of transvaginal synthetic mesh insertion should be considered. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0937-3462 1433-3023 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00192-012-1692-4 |