Single-incision apical and posterior mesh repair: 1-year prospective outcomes

Introduction and hypothesis The objective of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the Elevate Apical and Posterior single-incision mesh system (SIMS) with IntePro Lite for pelvic organ prolapse repair. Methods This prospective multicenter study included 139 women with ≥ stage II poste...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International Urogynecology Journal 2012-10, Vol.23 (10), p.1413-1419
Hauptverfasser: Lukban, James C., Roovers, Jan-Paul W. R., VanDrie, Douglas M., Erickson, Ty, Zylstra, Samuel, Patel, Manish P., Moore, Robert D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction and hypothesis The objective of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the Elevate Apical and Posterior single-incision mesh system (SIMS) with IntePro Lite for pelvic organ prolapse repair. Methods This prospective multicenter study included 139 women with ≥ stage II posterior vaginal prolapse and/or apical descent who underwent placement of type I polypropylene mesh through a single transvaginal incision with no external needle passes. Primary endpoint was the percent of patients with posterior and/or apical stage ≤ I (“cure”) at follow-up. Secondary endpoints included, but were not limited to, rate of mesh extrusion and disease-specific quality of life outcomes. Results At 12 months, objective posterior wall and apical cure rates were 92.5 and 89.2 %, respectively, with an extrusion rate of 6.5 %. Conclusions The SIMS appears to be effective and safe in treating patients with posterior vaginal and/or apical prolapse. The risks and benefits of transvaginal synthetic mesh insertion should be considered.
ISSN:0937-3462
1433-3023
DOI:10.1007/s00192-012-1692-4