Fovea-Sparing Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Myopic Traction Maculopathy

Purpose To investigate the effectiveness and safety of a new surgical technique of fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for the treatment of foveal retinal detachments (RDs) in eyes with myopic traction maculopathy. Design Retrospective, consecutive, interventional case series. Met...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of ophthalmology 2012-10, Vol.154 (4), p.693-701
Hauptverfasser: Shimada, Noriaki, Sugamoto, Yoshiharu, Ogawa, Manabu, Takase, Hiroshi, Ohno-Matsui, Kyoko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To investigate the effectiveness and safety of a new surgical technique of fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for the treatment of foveal retinal detachments (RDs) in eyes with myopic traction maculopathy. Design Retrospective, consecutive, interventional case series. Methods Forty-five eyes of 45 consecutive patients who underwent vitrectomy and ILM peeling for the treatment of a foveal RD attributable to myopic traction maculopathy were studied. The patients were divided into 2 groups by the area of ILM peeled: complete macular ILM peeled group (30 eyes) and fovea-sparing ILM peeled group (15 eyes). A gas tamponade was used in all of the eyes. The main outcome measures were the rate of development of a full-thickness macular hole (MH) and the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). All of the patients were followed for more than 6 months. Results A full-thickness MH developed in 5 of 30 eyes (16.7%) in the complete ILM peeled group and in none of the 15 eyes in the fovea-sparing ILM peeled group. Postoperative OCT examination showed a contraction of the residual ILM on the fovea and reduction of the outer lamellar holes in the fovea-sparing ILM peeled group. The postoperative BCVA was significantly better than the preoperative BCVA in the fovea-sparing ILM peeled group ( P = .04), but not in the complete ILM peeled group. Conclusions Fovea-sparing ILM peeling results in better visual and anatomic outcomes for the treatment of foveal RD attributable to myopic traction maculopathy. These were accomplished by reducing the development of a full-thickness MH.
ISSN:0002-9394
1879-1891
DOI:10.1016/j.ajo.2012.04.013