Underestimation of Clostridium difficile infection among clinicians: an international survey
The objective of this investigation was to document clinicians’ awareness regarding the incidence and severity of Clostridium difficile -associated diarrhea (CDAD). An international electronic survey was conducted among corresponding authors of articles indexed by PubMed and published during the las...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases 2012-09, Vol.31 (9), p.2439-2444 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The objective of this investigation was to document clinicians’ awareness regarding the incidence and severity of
Clostridium difficile
-associated diarrhea (CDAD). An international electronic survey was conducted among corresponding authors of articles indexed by PubMed and published during the last 10 years in ‘Core Clinical Journals’. A total of 1,163 clinicians answered (response rate 59%); most of the responses were submitted from North America (54.6%), Europe (32.2%), and Asia/Pacific (11.6%). Only 2.2% of the participants answered correctly all four questions, while 14.1% answered all questions incorrectly. Regarding each question, 10.8% of the participants correctly estimated current CDAD treatment failure or recurrence rates to be around 40%, 33.4% correctly estimated the ratio of antibiotic-associated colitis attributed to
C. difficile
to be around 60%, 72.7% correctly responded that almost all antibiotics are associated with CDAD, and 41.7% correctly responded that any patient is at risk for CDAD. Almost half (44.4%) of the respondents considered CDAD to be underestimated. Participants from North America scored higher than those from Europe or Asia/Pacific (
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0934-9723 1435-4373 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10096-012-1587-9 |