Design and economics of a hybrid membrane–temperature swing adsorption process for upgrading biogas

► A hybrid membrane–temperature swing adsorption process for upgrading biogas to pipeline quality methane is presented. ► Using an objective function a multi-stage process involving temperature swing adsorption and membranes was optimized. ► Techno-economic analysis showed that for processing 200Nm3...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of membrane science 2012-09, Vol.413-414, p.17-28
Hauptverfasser: Shao, Pinghai, Dal-Cin, Mauro, Kumar, Ashwani, Li, Haibin, Singh, Davinder Paul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:► A hybrid membrane–temperature swing adsorption process for upgrading biogas to pipeline quality methane is presented. ► Using an objective function a multi-stage process involving temperature swing adsorption and membranes was optimized. ► Techno-economic analysis showed that for processing 200Nm3/h biogas stream, a payback time on the investment was 6.8 months. Processing biogas from wastewater digesters allows recovery of valuable methane and reduction in green house gas emissions. A two-stage membrane process, coupled with a temperature-swing-adsorption (TSA) as pre-treatment, was designed to generate pipeline quality methane. To improve methane recovery and process energy efficiency, the non-product streams of the membrane process were recycled and the permeate of the first membrane stage was maintained at a given pressure as the driving force for second membrane stage. The membrane process design was optimized by minimizing the objective function; the overall processing cost. It was found the membrane approach excels the PSA for producing pipeline quality methane (97% purity) in terms of methane recovery, processing cost and lower emissions. A techno-economic analysis showed that the payback time for an operation processing 200Nm3/h of biogas was 6.8 months.
ISSN:0376-7388
1873-3123
DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2012.02.040