Post-discharge clinical and angiographic outcomes of patients presenting within 48h of STEMI treated with paclitaxel- or sirolimus-eluting stents

The purpose of the present study was to examine the mid-term clinical and angiographic outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who presented within 48h and received paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) or sirolimus-eluting stents (SES). This study was a retrospective,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cardiology 2012-09, Vol.60 (3), p.174-179
Hauptverfasser: Ishikawa, Tetsuya, Mutoh, Makoto, Nakano, Yosuke, Suzuki, Teruhiko, Nakata, Kotaro, Murakami, Akimichi, Miyamoto, Takashi, Yoshimura, Michihiro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The purpose of the present study was to examine the mid-term clinical and angiographic outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who presented within 48h and received paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) or sirolimus-eluting stents (SES). This study was a retrospective, non-randomized, single-center study. The post-discharge clinical outcomes of 357 consecutive patients who presented within 48h of their first STEMI and received PES (n=163) or SES (n=194) between February 2007 and February 2009 were analyzed in May 2011. The incidence of post-discharge events (i.e. cardiac death and non-fatal recurrent MI) after PES placement (0.6%) did not significantly differ from that after SES placement (1.5%). Treatment with PES was not related to the risk of adverse events post-discharge (mean follow-up period for PES placement, 1170±243 days; hazard ratio, 0.346; 95% CI, 0.036–3.371; p=0.361). No definite stent thromboses developed after treatment with PES or SES. The incidence of binary in-stent restenosis (stenosis of more than 50% of the diameter at secondary angiography performed 10–18 months after the initial procedure) after PES placement (17.1%) was significantly higher than that after SES placement (4.8%; p
ISSN:0914-5087
1876-4738
DOI:10.1016/j.jjcc.2012.03.009