High Ventricular Lead Impedance of a DDD Pacemaker after Cranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging

High Ventricular Lead Impedance of a DDD Pacemaker after Cranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Management of electromagnetic interference in the form of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with pacemakers (PMs) may be challenging. Serious consequences, especially in PM‐dependent patients, may be encountered. Changes in device programming, asynchronous pacing, heating of the lead tip(...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pacing and clinical electrophysiology 2012-09, Vol.35 (9), p.e251-e253
Hauptverfasser: BASER, KAZIM, GURAY, UMIT, DURUKAN, MINE, DEMIRKAN, BURCU
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Contraindications
Electrodes, Implanted
Equipment Failure
Head - pathology
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Pacemaker, Artificial
pacing
radiology
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e253
container_issue 9
container_start_page e251
container_title Pacing and clinical electrophysiology
container_volume 35
creator BASER, KAZIM
GURAY, UMIT
DURUKAN, MINE
DEMIRKAN, BURCU
description Management of electromagnetic interference in the form of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with pacemakers (PMs) may be challenging. Serious consequences, especially in PM‐dependent patients, may be encountered. Changes in device programming, asynchronous pacing, heating of the lead tip(s), and increased thresholds or even device dislocation may be experienced. We report of a patient with a DDD PM who underwent an emergent MRI, after which there was an increase in ventricular impedance as well as increased cardiac biomarkers. (PACE 2012; 35:e251–e253)
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03027.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1039039496</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1039039496</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3707-746910de7c8b1c25fbe2c806693ee48d7bd44e40b21d7591ed9d0ac20b1e71503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhoMoun78BcnRS-ukSZv2IsjuqgsriqgXDyFNpmvXfqzJFtd_b-uqZ8OQGcjzTuAhhDIIWX_OlyGLBQQpi7MwAsZC4BDJcLNDRn8Pu2QETMgg5Wl2QA69XwJAAiLeJwcR48B5Kkfk5aZcvNJnbNauNF2lHZ2jtnRWr9DqxiBtC6rpZDKh99pgrd_QUV2s-3vsdFPqit7qRYPr0tAH9G3znZnVelE2i2OyV-jK48lPPyJPV9PH8U0wv7uejS_ngeESZCBFkjGwKE2aMxPFRY6RSSFJMo4oUitzKwQKyCNmZZwxtJkFbSLIGUoWAz8iZ9u9K9e-d-jXqi69warSDbadVwx41pfIkh5Nt6hxrfcOC7VyZa3dZw-pQa1aqsGgGgyqQa36Vqs2ffT055cur9H-BX9d9sDFFvgoK_z892J1fzmeDiP_Al07hig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1039039496</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>High Ventricular Lead Impedance of a DDD Pacemaker after Cranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>BASER, KAZIM ; GURAY, UMIT ; DURUKAN, MINE ; DEMIRKAN, BURCU</creator><creatorcontrib>BASER, KAZIM ; GURAY, UMIT ; DURUKAN, MINE ; DEMIRKAN, BURCU</creatorcontrib><description>Management of electromagnetic interference in the form of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with pacemakers (PMs) may be challenging. Serious consequences, especially in PM‐dependent patients, may be encountered. Changes in device programming, asynchronous pacing, heating of the lead tip(s), and increased thresholds or even device dislocation may be experienced. We report of a patient with a DDD PM who underwent an emergent MRI, after which there was an increase in ventricular impedance as well as increased cardiac biomarkers. (PACE 2012; 35:e251–e253)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-8389</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03027.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21303387</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Contraindications ; Electrodes, Implanted ; Equipment Failure ; Head - pathology ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pacemaker, Artificial ; pacing ; radiology</subject><ispartof>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 2012-09, Vol.35 (9), p.e251-e253</ispartof><rights>2011, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3707-746910de7c8b1c25fbe2c806693ee48d7bd44e40b21d7591ed9d0ac20b1e71503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3707-746910de7c8b1c25fbe2c806693ee48d7bd44e40b21d7591ed9d0ac20b1e71503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8159.2011.03027.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8159.2011.03027.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21303387$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BASER, KAZIM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GURAY, UMIT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DURUKAN, MINE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEMIRKAN, BURCU</creatorcontrib><title>High Ventricular Lead Impedance of a DDD Pacemaker after Cranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging</title><title>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</title><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><description>Management of electromagnetic interference in the form of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with pacemakers (PMs) may be challenging. Serious consequences, especially in PM‐dependent patients, may be encountered. Changes in device programming, asynchronous pacing, heating of the lead tip(s), and increased thresholds or even device dislocation may be experienced. We report of a patient with a DDD PM who underwent an emergent MRI, after which there was an increase in ventricular impedance as well as increased cardiac biomarkers. (PACE 2012; 35:e251–e253)</description><subject>Contraindications</subject><subject>Electrodes, Implanted</subject><subject>Equipment Failure</subject><subject>Head - pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pacemaker, Artificial</subject><subject>pacing</subject><subject>radiology</subject><issn>0147-8389</issn><issn>1540-8159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhoMoun78BcnRS-ukSZv2IsjuqgsriqgXDyFNpmvXfqzJFtd_b-uqZ8OQGcjzTuAhhDIIWX_OlyGLBQQpi7MwAsZC4BDJcLNDRn8Pu2QETMgg5Wl2QA69XwJAAiLeJwcR48B5Kkfk5aZcvNJnbNauNF2lHZ2jtnRWr9DqxiBtC6rpZDKh99pgrd_QUV2s-3vsdFPqit7qRYPr0tAH9G3znZnVelE2i2OyV-jK48lPPyJPV9PH8U0wv7uejS_ngeESZCBFkjGwKE2aMxPFRY6RSSFJMo4oUitzKwQKyCNmZZwxtJkFbSLIGUoWAz8iZ9u9K9e-d-jXqi69warSDbadVwx41pfIkh5Nt6hxrfcOC7VyZa3dZw-pQa1aqsGgGgyqQa36Vqs2ffT055cur9H-BX9d9sDFFvgoK_z892J1fzmeDiP_Al07hig</recordid><startdate>201209</startdate><enddate>201209</enddate><creator>BASER, KAZIM</creator><creator>GURAY, UMIT</creator><creator>DURUKAN, MINE</creator><creator>DEMIRKAN, BURCU</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201209</creationdate><title>High Ventricular Lead Impedance of a DDD Pacemaker after Cranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging</title><author>BASER, KAZIM ; GURAY, UMIT ; DURUKAN, MINE ; DEMIRKAN, BURCU</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3707-746910de7c8b1c25fbe2c806693ee48d7bd44e40b21d7591ed9d0ac20b1e71503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Contraindications</topic><topic>Electrodes, Implanted</topic><topic>Equipment Failure</topic><topic>Head - pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pacemaker, Artificial</topic><topic>pacing</topic><topic>radiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BASER, KAZIM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GURAY, UMIT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DURUKAN, MINE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEMIRKAN, BURCU</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BASER, KAZIM</au><au>GURAY, UMIT</au><au>DURUKAN, MINE</au><au>DEMIRKAN, BURCU</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>High Ventricular Lead Impedance of a DDD Pacemaker after Cranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging</atitle><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><date>2012-09</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e251</spage><epage>e253</epage><pages>e251-e253</pages><issn>0147-8389</issn><eissn>1540-8159</eissn><abstract>Management of electromagnetic interference in the form of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with pacemakers (PMs) may be challenging. Serious consequences, especially in PM‐dependent patients, may be encountered. Changes in device programming, asynchronous pacing, heating of the lead tip(s), and increased thresholds or even device dislocation may be experienced. We report of a patient with a DDD PM who underwent an emergent MRI, after which there was an increase in ventricular impedance as well as increased cardiac biomarkers. (PACE 2012; 35:e251–e253)</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>21303387</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03027.x</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0147-8389
ispartof Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 2012-09, Vol.35 (9), p.e251-e253
issn 0147-8389
1540-8159
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1039039496
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Contraindications
Electrodes, Implanted
Equipment Failure
Head - pathology
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Pacemaker, Artificial
pacing
radiology
title High Ventricular Lead Impedance of a DDD Pacemaker after Cranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T11%3A00%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=High%20Ventricular%20Lead%20Impedance%20of%20a%20DDD%20Pacemaker%20after%20Cranial%20Magnetic%20Resonance%20Imaging&rft.jtitle=Pacing%20and%20clinical%20electrophysiology&rft.au=BASER,%20KAZIM&rft.date=2012-09&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e251&rft.epage=e253&rft.pages=e251-e253&rft.issn=0147-8389&rft.eissn=1540-8159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03027.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1039039496%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1039039496&rft_id=info:pmid/21303387&rfr_iscdi=true