Geometry parameters effect for air-cooled ejector cooling systems with R134a refrigerant
In this paper, a CFD model calibrated by the experimental results from initial designed ejector is used to evaluate the influence of 6 key geometry parameters on the performance (entrainment ratio) of an air-cooled ejector cooling system and, consequently, to find the best design parameters. A new e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Renewable energy 2012-10, Vol.46, p.155-163 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 163 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 155 |
container_title | Renewable energy |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Yan, Jia Cai, Wenjian Li, Yanzhong |
description | In this paper, a CFD model calibrated by the experimental results from initial designed ejector is used to evaluate the influence of 6 key geometry parameters on the performance (entrainment ratio) of an air-cooled ejector cooling system and, consequently, to find the best design parameters. A new ejector according to the findings from the CFD simulation is then designed and used at the same air-cooled ejector system to verify the simulation results. From both simulation and testing results, we find that: 1) the optimal area ratio, the ratio of primary nozzle exist position and length of constant-area mixing section to primary nozzle diameter are lower than those of water-cooled ejector systems; 2) the optimal converging angle of constant-pressure mixing section and the ratio of primary nozzle exit position and length of constant-area mixing section to the diameter of constant-area mixing section are very close to those of water-cooled ejector systems; 3) substantial performance improvement can be achieved by using the new parameters in the ejector design.
► Study the influence of geometry parameters on the air-cooled ejector performance. ► CFD model is established and calibrated by the experimental results. ► The optimal γA are much lower than those of water-cooled ejector systems. ► The optimal NXP/Dn and Lm/Dn are lower than those of water-cooled ejector systems. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.renene.2012.03.031 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1038616372</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0960148112002182</els_id><sourcerecordid>1038616372</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-571fcb720413aec01708256e91c5917e799e78fe3f35ed8cc072b27caa76d2303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpodu0_6AQXQK9eDMj2ZZ9CZTQpIVAoU0gN6HIo40Wr7WVnJb995nFocegAc0Mz3y9QnxGWCNge75dZ5r4rRWgWoNmwzdihZ3pK2g79VasoG-hwrrD9-JDKVsAbDpTr8T9NaUdzfkg9y479igXSSGQn2VIWbqYK5_SSIOkLSc5dQzjtJHlUGbaFfkvzo_yF-rayUwhxw1lN80fxbvgxkKfXv4TcXf17fbye3Xz8_rH5debyutez1VjMPgHo6BG7cgDGuhU01KPvunRkOl7Ml0gHXRDQ-c9GPWgjHfOtIPSoE_El6XvPqc_T1Rmu4vF0zi6idJTsQi6a7HVRjFaL6jPqRTe1e5z3Ll8YMgehbRbuwhpj0Ja0GzIZWcvE1zxbgx8nY_lf61qel2bVjN3unDBJes2mZm739yogeNVGhsmLhaCWJC_kbItPtLkaYiZtbVDiq-v8gwwMJPu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1038616372</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Geometry parameters effect for air-cooled ejector cooling systems with R134a refrigerant</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Yan, Jia ; Cai, Wenjian ; Li, Yanzhong</creator><creatorcontrib>Yan, Jia ; Cai, Wenjian ; Li, Yanzhong</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, a CFD model calibrated by the experimental results from initial designed ejector is used to evaluate the influence of 6 key geometry parameters on the performance (entrainment ratio) of an air-cooled ejector cooling system and, consequently, to find the best design parameters. A new ejector according to the findings from the CFD simulation is then designed and used at the same air-cooled ejector system to verify the simulation results. From both simulation and testing results, we find that: 1) the optimal area ratio, the ratio of primary nozzle exist position and length of constant-area mixing section to primary nozzle diameter are lower than those of water-cooled ejector systems; 2) the optimal converging angle of constant-pressure mixing section and the ratio of primary nozzle exit position and length of constant-area mixing section to the diameter of constant-area mixing section are very close to those of water-cooled ejector systems; 3) substantial performance improvement can be achieved by using the new parameters in the ejector design.
► Study the influence of geometry parameters on the air-cooled ejector performance. ► CFD model is established and calibrated by the experimental results. ► The optimal γA are much lower than those of water-cooled ejector systems. ► The optimal NXP/Dn and Lm/Dn are lower than those of water-cooled ejector systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-1481</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0682</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.03.031</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Air-cooled ; Applied sciences ; CFD simulation ; cooling systems ; Ejector cooling systems ; Energy ; Entrainment ratio ; Exact sciences and technology ; Geometry parameters ; mixing ; renewable energy sources ; Testing</subject><ispartof>Renewable energy, 2012-10, Vol.46, p.155-163</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-571fcb720413aec01708256e91c5917e799e78fe3f35ed8cc072b27caa76d2303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-571fcb720413aec01708256e91c5917e799e78fe3f35ed8cc072b27caa76d2303</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148112002182$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25934763$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yan, Jia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Wenjian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yanzhong</creatorcontrib><title>Geometry parameters effect for air-cooled ejector cooling systems with R134a refrigerant</title><title>Renewable energy</title><description>In this paper, a CFD model calibrated by the experimental results from initial designed ejector is used to evaluate the influence of 6 key geometry parameters on the performance (entrainment ratio) of an air-cooled ejector cooling system and, consequently, to find the best design parameters. A new ejector according to the findings from the CFD simulation is then designed and used at the same air-cooled ejector system to verify the simulation results. From both simulation and testing results, we find that: 1) the optimal area ratio, the ratio of primary nozzle exist position and length of constant-area mixing section to primary nozzle diameter are lower than those of water-cooled ejector systems; 2) the optimal converging angle of constant-pressure mixing section and the ratio of primary nozzle exit position and length of constant-area mixing section to the diameter of constant-area mixing section are very close to those of water-cooled ejector systems; 3) substantial performance improvement can be achieved by using the new parameters in the ejector design.
► Study the influence of geometry parameters on the air-cooled ejector performance. ► CFD model is established and calibrated by the experimental results. ► The optimal γA are much lower than those of water-cooled ejector systems. ► The optimal NXP/Dn and Lm/Dn are lower than those of water-cooled ejector systems.</description><subject>Air-cooled</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>CFD simulation</subject><subject>cooling systems</subject><subject>Ejector cooling systems</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Entrainment ratio</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Geometry parameters</subject><subject>mixing</subject><subject>renewable energy sources</subject><subject>Testing</subject><issn>0960-1481</issn><issn>1879-0682</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpodu0_6AQXQK9eDMj2ZZ9CZTQpIVAoU0gN6HIo40Wr7WVnJb995nFocegAc0Mz3y9QnxGWCNge75dZ5r4rRWgWoNmwzdihZ3pK2g79VasoG-hwrrD9-JDKVsAbDpTr8T9NaUdzfkg9y479igXSSGQn2VIWbqYK5_SSIOkLSc5dQzjtJHlUGbaFfkvzo_yF-rayUwhxw1lN80fxbvgxkKfXv4TcXf17fbye3Xz8_rH5debyutez1VjMPgHo6BG7cgDGuhU01KPvunRkOl7Ml0gHXRDQ-c9GPWgjHfOtIPSoE_El6XvPqc_T1Rmu4vF0zi6idJTsQi6a7HVRjFaL6jPqRTe1e5z3Ll8YMgehbRbuwhpj0Ja0GzIZWcvE1zxbgx8nY_lf61qel2bVjN3unDBJes2mZm739yogeNVGhsmLhaCWJC_kbItPtLkaYiZtbVDiq-v8gwwMJPu</recordid><startdate>20121001</startdate><enddate>20121001</enddate><creator>Yan, Jia</creator><creator>Cai, Wenjian</creator><creator>Li, Yanzhong</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121001</creationdate><title>Geometry parameters effect for air-cooled ejector cooling systems with R134a refrigerant</title><author>Yan, Jia ; Cai, Wenjian ; Li, Yanzhong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-571fcb720413aec01708256e91c5917e799e78fe3f35ed8cc072b27caa76d2303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Air-cooled</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>CFD simulation</topic><topic>cooling systems</topic><topic>Ejector cooling systems</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Entrainment ratio</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Geometry parameters</topic><topic>mixing</topic><topic>renewable energy sources</topic><topic>Testing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yan, Jia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Wenjian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yanzhong</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Renewable energy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yan, Jia</au><au>Cai, Wenjian</au><au>Li, Yanzhong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Geometry parameters effect for air-cooled ejector cooling systems with R134a refrigerant</atitle><jtitle>Renewable energy</jtitle><date>2012-10-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>46</volume><spage>155</spage><epage>163</epage><pages>155-163</pages><issn>0960-1481</issn><eissn>1879-0682</eissn><abstract>In this paper, a CFD model calibrated by the experimental results from initial designed ejector is used to evaluate the influence of 6 key geometry parameters on the performance (entrainment ratio) of an air-cooled ejector cooling system and, consequently, to find the best design parameters. A new ejector according to the findings from the CFD simulation is then designed and used at the same air-cooled ejector system to verify the simulation results. From both simulation and testing results, we find that: 1) the optimal area ratio, the ratio of primary nozzle exist position and length of constant-area mixing section to primary nozzle diameter are lower than those of water-cooled ejector systems; 2) the optimal converging angle of constant-pressure mixing section and the ratio of primary nozzle exit position and length of constant-area mixing section to the diameter of constant-area mixing section are very close to those of water-cooled ejector systems; 3) substantial performance improvement can be achieved by using the new parameters in the ejector design.
► Study the influence of geometry parameters on the air-cooled ejector performance. ► CFD model is established and calibrated by the experimental results. ► The optimal γA are much lower than those of water-cooled ejector systems. ► The optimal NXP/Dn and Lm/Dn are lower than those of water-cooled ejector systems.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.renene.2012.03.031</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-1481 |
ispartof | Renewable energy, 2012-10, Vol.46, p.155-163 |
issn | 0960-1481 1879-0682 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1038616372 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Air-cooled Applied sciences CFD simulation cooling systems Ejector cooling systems Energy Entrainment ratio Exact sciences and technology Geometry parameters mixing renewable energy sources Testing |
title | Geometry parameters effect for air-cooled ejector cooling systems with R134a refrigerant |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T13%3A12%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Geometry%20parameters%20effect%20for%20air-cooled%20ejector%20cooling%20systems%20with%20R134a%20refrigerant&rft.jtitle=Renewable%20energy&rft.au=Yan,%20Jia&rft.date=2012-10-01&rft.volume=46&rft.spage=155&rft.epage=163&rft.pages=155-163&rft.issn=0960-1481&rft.eissn=1879-0682&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.renene.2012.03.031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1038616372%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1038616372&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0960148112002182&rfr_iscdi=true |