Geometry parameters effect for air-cooled ejector cooling systems with R134a refrigerant

In this paper, a CFD model calibrated by the experimental results from initial designed ejector is used to evaluate the influence of 6 key geometry parameters on the performance (entrainment ratio) of an air-cooled ejector cooling system and, consequently, to find the best design parameters. A new e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Renewable energy 2012-10, Vol.46, p.155-163
Hauptverfasser: Yan, Jia, Cai, Wenjian, Li, Yanzhong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this paper, a CFD model calibrated by the experimental results from initial designed ejector is used to evaluate the influence of 6 key geometry parameters on the performance (entrainment ratio) of an air-cooled ejector cooling system and, consequently, to find the best design parameters. A new ejector according to the findings from the CFD simulation is then designed and used at the same air-cooled ejector system to verify the simulation results. From both simulation and testing results, we find that: 1) the optimal area ratio, the ratio of primary nozzle exist position and length of constant-area mixing section to primary nozzle diameter are lower than those of water-cooled ejector systems; 2) the optimal converging angle of constant-pressure mixing section and the ratio of primary nozzle exit position and length of constant-area mixing section to the diameter of constant-area mixing section are very close to those of water-cooled ejector systems; 3) substantial performance improvement can be achieved by using the new parameters in the ejector design. ► Study the influence of geometry parameters on the air-cooled ejector performance. ► CFD model is established and calibrated by the experimental results. ► The optimal γA are much lower than those of water-cooled ejector systems. ► The optimal NXP/Dn and Lm/Dn are lower than those of water-cooled ejector systems.
ISSN:0960-1481
1879-0682
DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2012.03.031