DNA ploidy measurement in oral leukoplakia: Different results between flow and image cytometry

Summary The estimated prevalence of oral leukoplakia is worldwide approximately 2%, with an annual malignant transformation rate of approximately 1%. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the possible contribution of ploidy measurement to the prediction of the clinical course, in a well defin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oral oncology 2012-07, Vol.48 (7), p.636-640
Hauptverfasser: Brouns, E.R.E.A, Bloemena, E, Belien, J.A.M, Broeckaert, M.A.M, Aartman, I.H.A, van der Waal, I
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary The estimated prevalence of oral leukoplakia is worldwide approximately 2%, with an annual malignant transformation rate of approximately 1%. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the possible contribution of ploidy measurement to the prediction of the clinical course, in a well defined cohort of patients with oral leukoplakia. Ploidy was measured by both flow cytometry (FCM-DNA) and image cytometry (ICM-DNA) and we focussed on the comparison of the two different techniques to determine ploidy. A total of 41 patients have been included, with a mean age of 59 years (range 36–78 years). With FCM-DNA, three lesions were aneuploid, with ICM-DNA, 19 lesions were aneuploid. DNA ploidy was compared with clinicopathological and patients parameters. There were no statistically significant differences between DNA ploidy and any patient factor with both FCM-DNA and ICM-DNA. Using FCM-DNA, DNA aneuploid lesions showed statistically significant more dysplasia ( p = 0.04) than diploid lesions. Furthermore, DNA aneuploid lesions were more frequently encountered at high-risk locations ( p = 0.03) as being determined with FCM-DNA. These relations were not found when DNA ploidy was determined with ICM-DNA.
ISSN:1368-8375
1879-0593
DOI:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.01.013