Transversus abdominis plane block

Since the publication of original work on the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, the translation of the research into clinical practice has resulted in some 146 articles being published in peer-reviewed journals. However, there continues to be controversies over the best approach to be used. T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current opinion in anaesthesiology 2012-10, Vol.25 (5), p.610-614
Hauptverfasser: Finnerty, Olivia, McDonnell, John G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Since the publication of original work on the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, the translation of the research into clinical practice has resulted in some 146 articles being published in peer-reviewed journals. However, there continues to be controversies over the best approach to be used. The introduction of ultrasound should have aided the development of this block, but in fact it has caused more questions to be asked. There are a number of reviews of the block already published, but were they published too early and what is our current understanding of the TAP block and its mechanisms of action? The TAP block continues to develop. We now understand that the TAP block is a multifaceted block, working with both localized field effects as well as distal effects due to a distant spread of local anesthetic. Recent research would suggest that the location of needle tip placement causes variation in the block characteristics obtained. The more anterior approaches adopted for use since the introduction of ultrasound might be better described as RAFI (regional abdominal field infiltration) blocks. The TAP block, in all its guises, is an effective analgesic tool, but what is the best approach? Randomized controlled trials comparing the TAP/RAFI blocks to epidural based analgesia are required.
ISSN:0952-7907
1473-6500
DOI:10.1097/ACO.0b013e328357b165