Evidence for augmented oxidative stress in the subjects with type 1 diabetes and their siblings: a possible preventive role for antioxidants
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Oxidative stress (OS) is thought to be involved in both development of type 1 diabetes (T1D) and its further complications. In this study, certain biomarkers of OS were compared among the subjects with T1D, their non-diabetic siblings and unrelated healthy controls. SUBJECTS/M...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of clinical nutrition 2012-09, Vol.66 (9), p.1054-1058 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES:
Oxidative stress (OS) is thought to be involved in both development of type 1 diabetes (T1D) and its further complications. In this study, certain biomarkers of OS were compared among the subjects with T1D, their non-diabetic siblings and unrelated healthy controls.
SUBJECTS/METHODS:
Known cases of T1D from both sexes aged 5–25 years were enrolled in a case–control study (
n
1
=60). There were two control groups; non-diabetic siblings (
n
2
=60) and unrelated apparently healthy subjects (
n
3
=60). Anthropometric, dietary and laboratory assessments were done.
RESULTS:
There was no significant difference in dietary data among the groups. Total antioxidant capacity was significantly lower in T1D than both related and unrelated controls (1.6±0.05, 1.7±0.05 and 1.8±0.06 mmol BSA equivalent/l, respectively,
P
=0.044). Both T1D subjects and their siblings showed lower glutathione peroxidase (GSH-px) levels (median (interquartile range): 22.2 (28.6), 29.9 (23) and 41.8 (73.6) U/ml, respectively,
P
=0.006). On the contrary, superoxide dismutase concentrations were significantly higher in T1D group and the siblings than unrelated healthy controls (243 (45.3), 157.8 (176.9) and 27.9 (8.7) U/l, respectively,
P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0954-3007 1476-5640 |
DOI: | 10.1038/ejcn.2012.81 |