Impact of tDCS on performance and learning of target detection: Interaction with stimulus characteristics and experimental design
► Mechanisms of tDCS enhancement of hidden object detection was examined. ► Target object detection accuracy and d′ were increased by tDCS. ► Response bias β was not affected by tDCS. ► Effects were largest for repeated images that contained hidden objects. ► Single-blind and double-blind task desig...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neuropsychologia 2012-06, Vol.50 (7), p.1594-1602 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | ► Mechanisms of tDCS enhancement of hidden object detection was examined. ► Target object detection accuracy and d′ were increased by tDCS. ► Response bias β was not affected by tDCS. ► Effects were largest for repeated images that contained hidden objects. ► Single-blind and double-blind task designs produced similar results.
We have previously found that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over right inferior frontal cortex (RIFC) enhances performance during learning of a difficult visual target detection task (Clark et al., 2012). In order to examine the cognitive mechanisms of tDCS that lead to enhanced performance, here we analyzed its differential effects on responses to stimuli that varied by repetition and target presence, differences related to expectancy by comparing performance in single- and double-blind task designs, and individual differences in skin stimulation and mood. Participants were trained for 1h to detect target objects hidden in a complex virtual environment, while anodal tDCS was applied over RIFC at 0.1mA or 2.0mA for the first 30min. Participants were tested immediately before and after training and again 1h later. Higher tDCS current was associated with increased performance for all test stimuli, but was greatest for repeated test stimuli with the presence of hidden-targets. This finding was replicated in a second set of subjects using a double-blind task design. Accuracy for target detection discrimination sensitivity (d′; Z(hits)−Z(false alarms)) was greater for 2.0mA current (1.77) compared with 0.1mA (0.95), with no differences in response bias (β). Taken together, these findings indicate that the enhancement of performance with tDCS is sensitive to stimulus repetition and target presence, but not to changes in expectancy, mood, or type of blinded task design. The implications of these findings for understanding the cognitive mechanisms of tDCS are discussed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-3932 1873-3514 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.03.012 |