The Effect of Internal Versus External Abutment Connection Modes on Crestal Bone Changes Around Dental Implants: A Radiographic Analysis

Background: To the best of our knowledge, the influence of external versus internal implant–abutment connections on crestal bone remodeling has not been reported. The aim of the present study is to investigate the influence of the abutment connection on peri‐implant crestal bone levels (CBLs) using...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of periodontology (1970) 2012-09, Vol.83 (9), p.1104-1109
Hauptverfasser: Koo, Ki‐Tae, Lee, Eun‐Jeong, Kim, Jae‐Yoon, Seol, Yang‐Jo, Han, Jung Suk, Kim, Tae‐Il, Lee, Yong Moo, Ku, Young, Wikesjö, Ulf M.E., Rhyu, In‐Chul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: To the best of our knowledge, the influence of external versus internal implant–abutment connections on crestal bone remodeling has not been reported. The aim of the present study is to investigate the influence of the abutment connection on peri‐implant crestal bone levels (CBLs) using radiographic recordings. Methods: Radiographic recordings from 40 single‐tooth implants (20 external and 20 internal octagonal connections; one implant/patient) in 40 patients (15 males and 25 females; mean age: 54.3 years) were selected for analyses. The radiographic evaluation included the following: 1) linear bone change (LBC); 2) dimensional change (DC); and 3) angle between the implant and adjacent bone (AIB). Differences in LBC, DC, and AIB between implant placement and 1 year after loading for each system were evaluated using a paired t test. Comparison of LBC, DC, and AIB between systems at 1 year after loading was done using analysis of covariance. The significance level was set at P ≤0.05. Results: Radiographic CBLs (LBCs) were reduced at 1 year after loading compared to those at implant placement to reach statistical significance for the external connection (P = 0.000) but not the internal connection (P = 0.939). CBL changes were significantly greater for the external compared to the internal connection (P = 0.000). Similarly, the DC for the external connection was significantly greater compared to that for the internal connection (P = 0.004). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, the implant–abutment connection technology appears to have a significant impact on peri‐implant CBLs, with the external connection paralleled by a significant reduction of CBLs.
ISSN:0022-3492
1943-3670
DOI:10.1902/jop.2011.110456