Towards an incentive salience model of intertemporal choice

► The paper presents an adaptation of the quasi-hyperbolic discounting model. ► Impulsive decisions are induced by a mechanism called cue-triggered “wanting”. ► Individuals can impulsively “want” rewards more than they “like” them. ► Need deprivation states are essential for cue-triggered “wanting”...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of economic psychology 2012-08, Vol.33 (4), p.833-841
1. Verfasser: Lades, Leonhard K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:► The paper presents an adaptation of the quasi-hyperbolic discounting model. ► Impulsive decisions are induced by a mechanism called cue-triggered “wanting”. ► Individuals can impulsively “want” rewards more than they “like” them. ► Need deprivation states are essential for cue-triggered “wanting” to occur. ► Due to the emphasis on needs, parts of the domain effect can be explained. This theoretical paper presents an incentive salience model of intertemporal choice. The model is a variation of the quasi-hyperbolic discounting model. Based on the distinction between ‘wanting’ and ‘liking’, the paper presents one possible explanation of impulsive choices of smaller sooner rewards instead of larger later ones. These impulsive choices are induced by cues that trigger strong motivational ‘wanting’ to obtain smaller sooner rewards, but do not necessarily influence the degree to which the rewards are ‘liked’. Cue-triggered ‘wanting’ can occur when an individual is in a specific need deprivation state, perceives a cue previously associated with an immediately obtainable reward, knows that the cued reward can reduce the current deprivation state, and lacks self-control. Attributable to the integration of cue-triggered ‘wanting’ into an intertemporal choice model, the incentive salience can account for anomalies in intertemporal choice such as present-biased preferences and the domain effect.
ISSN:0167-4870
1872-7719
DOI:10.1016/j.joep.2012.03.007