L 1 / 2 Regularization: A Thresholding Representation Theory and a Fast Solver

The special importance of L 1 / 2 regularization has been recognized in recent studies on sparse modeling (particularly on compressed sensing). The L 1 / 2 regularization, however, leads to a nonconvex, nonsmooth, and non-Lipschitz optimization problem that is difficult to solve fast and efficiently...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transaction on neural networks and learning systems 2012-07, Vol.23 (7), p.1013-1027
Hauptverfasser: Xu, Zongben, Chang, Xiangyu, Xu, Fengmin, Zhang, Hai
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The special importance of L 1 / 2 regularization has been recognized in recent studies on sparse modeling (particularly on compressed sensing). The L 1 / 2 regularization, however, leads to a nonconvex, nonsmooth, and non-Lipschitz optimization problem that is difficult to solve fast and efficiently. In this paper, through developing a threshoding representation theory for L 1 / 2 regularization, we propose an iterative half thresholding algorithm for fast solution of L 1 / 2 regularization, corresponding to the well-known iterative soft thresholding algorithm for L 1 regularization, and the iterative hard thresholding algorithm for L 0 regularization. We prove the existence of the resolvent of gradient of [par] x [par] 1 / 2 1 / 2 , calculate its analytic expression, and establish an alternative feature theorem on solutions of L 1 / 2 regularization, based on which a thresholding representation of solutions of L 1 / 2 regularization is derived and an optimal regularization parameter setting rule is formulated. The developed theory provides a successful practice of extension of the well-known Moreau's proximity forward-backward splitting theory to the L 1 / 2 regularization case. We verify the convergence of the iterative half thresholding algorithm and provide a series of experiments to assess performance of the algorithm. The experiments show that the half algorithm is effective, efficient, and can be accepted as a fast solver for L 1 / 2 regularization. With the new algorithm, we conduct a phase diagram study to further demonstrate the superiority of L 1 / 2 regularization over L 1 regularization.
ISSN:2162-237X
2162-2388
DOI:10.1109/TNNLS.2012.2197412