Excipients Differentially Influence the Conformational Stability and Pretransition Dynamics of Two IgG1 Monoclonal Antibodies
Since immunoglobulins are conformationally dynamic molecules in solution, we studied the effect of stabilizing and destabilizing excipients on the conformational stability and dynamics of two IgG1 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs; mAb-A and mAb-B) using a variety of biophysical approaches. Even though th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of pharmaceutical sciences 2012-09, Vol.101 (9), p.3062-3077 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Since immunoglobulins are conformationally dynamic molecules in solution, we studied the effect of stabilizing and destabilizing excipients on the conformational stability and dynamics of two IgG1 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs; mAb-A and mAb-B) using a variety of biophysical approaches. Even though the two mAbs are of the same IgG1 subtype, the unfolding patterns, aggregation behavior, and pretransition dynamics of these two antibodies were strikingly different in response to external perturbations such as pH, temperature, and presence of excipients. Sucrose and arginine were identified as stabilizers and destabilizers, respectively, on the basis of their influence on conformational stability for both the IgG1 mAbs. The two excipients, however, had distinct effective concentrations and different effects on the conformational stability and pretransition dynamics of the two mAbs as measured by a combination of differential scanning calorimetry, high-resolution ultrasonic spectroscopy, and red-edge excitation shift fluorescence studies. Stabilizing concentrations of sucrose were found to decrease the internal motions of mAb-B, whereas arginine marginally increased its adiabatic compressibility in the pretransition region. Both sucrose and arginine did not influence the pretransition dynamics of mAb-A. The potential reasons for such differences in excipient effects between two IgG1 mAbs are discussed. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 101:3062–3077, 2012 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3549 1520-6017 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jps.23187 |