Recent changes in tropospheric water vapor over the Arctic as assessed from radiosondes and atmospheric reanalyses
Changes in tropospheric water vapor over the Arctic are examined for the period 1979 to 2010 using humidity and temperature data from nine high latitude radiosonde stations north of 70°N with nearly complete records, and from six atmospheric reanalyses, emphasizing the three most modern efforts, MER...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres 2012-05, Vol.117 (D10), p.1V-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Changes in tropospheric water vapor over the Arctic are examined for the period 1979 to 2010 using humidity and temperature data from nine high latitude radiosonde stations north of 70°N with nearly complete records, and from six atmospheric reanalyses, emphasizing the three most modern efforts, MERRA, CFSR and ERA‐Interim. Based on comparisons with the radiosonde profiles, the reanalyses as a group have positive cold‐season humidity and temperature biases below the 850 hPa level and consequently do not capture observed low‐level humidity and temperature inversions. MERRA has the smallest biases. Trends in column‐integrated (surface to 500 hPa) water vapor (precipitable water) computed using data from the radiosondes and from the three modern reanalyses at the radiosonde locations are mostly positive, but magnitudes and statistical significance vary widely between sites and seasons. Positive trends in precipitable water from MERRA, CFSR and ERA‐Interim, largest in summer and early autumn, dominate the northern North Atlantic, including the Greenland, Norwegian and Barents seas, the Canadian Arctic Archipelago and (on the Pacific side) the Beaufort and Chukchi seas. This pattern is linked to positive anomalies in air and sea surface temperature and negative anomalies in end‐of‐summer sea ice extent. Trends from ERA‐Interim are weaker than those from either MERRA or CFSR. As assessed for polar cap averages (the region north of 70°N), MERRA, CFSR and ERA‐Interim all show increasing surface‐500 hPa precipitable over the analysis period encompassing most months, consistent with increases in 850 hPa air temperature and 850 hPa specific humidity. Data from all of the reanalyses point to strong interannual and decadal variability. The MERRA record in particular shows evidence of artifacts likely introduced by changes in assimilation data streams. A focus on the most recent decade (2001–2010) reveals large differences between the three reanalyses in the vertical structure of specific humidity and temperature anomalies.
Key Points
Positive trends in tropospheric water vapor are seen in parts of the Arctic
Patterns are linked to warming air temperature and reduced sea ice extent
Differences in trends occur between different reanalyses |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0148-0227 2169-897X 2156-2202 2169-8996 |
DOI: | 10.1029/2011JD017421 |