Evaluation of two new surrogate indices including parameters not using insulin to assess insulin sensitivity/resistance in non-diabetic postmenopausal women: A MONET group study

Abstract Aim The study evaluated and compared, with other surrogate indices of insulin sensitivity/resistance (IS/R), the relevance of the TyG index, a product of fasting glucose and triglyceride (TG) levels, and the EGIR index, which includes TG, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) and wai...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes & metabolism 2012-06, Vol.38 (3), p.258-263
Hauptverfasser: Bastard, J.-P, Lavoie, M.-E, Messier, V, Prud’homme, D, Rabasa-Lhoret, R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Aim The study evaluated and compared, with other surrogate indices of insulin sensitivity/resistance (IS/R), the relevance of the TyG index, a product of fasting glucose and triglyceride (TG) levels, and the EGIR index, which includes TG, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) and waist circumference in its formula to estimate IS/R, in non-diabetic postmenopausal women. Methods A secondary analysis was performed using the baseline data for 163 non-diabetic postmenopausal women from the Montreal–Ottawa New Emerging Team (MONET) population database. The subjects participated in hyperinsulinaemic–euglycaemic (HIEG) clamp and oral glucose tolerance (OGTT) tests. Correlations and comparisons between surrogate indices were performed in addition to inter-rater agreement tests. The optimal value of surrogate indices for diagnosis of IS/R was established on a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) scatter plot. Results A significant correlation was found between the HIEG clamp and all IS/R surrogate indices tested [r = −0.370 (TyG index) to 0.608 (SIisOGTT index); P < 0.001]. On ROC curve analysis, a higher AUROC was found for SIisOGTT (0.791) than for TyG and EGIR (0.706 and 0.675, respectively; P = 0.07 and P < 0.05, respectively). Conclusion The TyG and EGIR IS/R indices were only relatively modestly related to the HIEG clamp. In contrast, both fasting- and OGTT-derived IS/R surrogate indices, which include insulin values in their formulae, appeared to be more accurate in estimating IS/R in our study population. Thus, the TyG and EGIR IS/R indices need to be tested and validated more extensively in different populations before being put to large-scale clinical use.
ISSN:1262-3636
1878-1780
DOI:10.1016/j.diabet.2012.01.004