The Effect of Contact Lens Usage on Corneal Biomechanical Parameters in Myopic Patients

PURPOSE:To determine and compare the corneal biomechanical properties in myopic patients who use contact lenses and those who do not use contact lenses. METHODS:The study consisted of 56 myopic patients who used contact lenses (study group) and 123 myopic patients who did not use contact lenses (con...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cornea 2012-07, Vol.31 (7), p.764-769
Hauptverfasser: Cankaya, Ali B, Beyazyildiz, Emrullah, Ileri, Dilek, Ozturk, Faruk
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:PURPOSE:To determine and compare the corneal biomechanical properties in myopic patients who use contact lenses and those who do not use contact lenses. METHODS:The study consisted of 56 myopic patients who used contact lenses (study group) and 123 myopic patients who did not use contact lenses (control group). Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured with an ocular response analyzer (ORA) and a Goldmann applanation tonometer. Central corneal thickness was measured with an ultrasonic pachymeter. Axial length and anterior chamber depth measurements were acquired with contact ultrasound A-scan biometry. The differences in ORA parameters between study and control group participants were analyzed. RESULTS:The mean corneal hysteresis in study and control groups was 10.1 ± 1.6 mm Hg (6.5–15.9 mm Hg) and 9.7 ± 1.5 mm Hg (6.3–14.2 mm Hg), respectively (P = 0.16). The mean corneal resistance factor was 10.4 ± 1.9 mm Hg (4.6–15.5 mm Hg) in the study group compared with 9.6 ± 1.9 mm Hg (5.1–15.0 mm Hg) in the control group. The difference for corneal resistance factor was statistically significant (P = 0.014). There was no significant difference in corneal-compensated IOP (P = 0.24). Mean Goldmann-correlated IOP was significantly higher in the study group than in control subjects (15.8 ± 3.2 vs. 14.7 ± 3.7 mm Hg) (P = 0.044). None of the corneal biomechanical parameters was significantly correlated to duration of contact lens usage in the study group. CONCLUSIONS:Our results suggest that ORA-generated parameters may be different in subjects with and without contact lens usage. Further longitudinal studies need to be performed to establish the relevance of our results.
ISSN:0277-3740
1536-4798
DOI:10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182248239