Evaluating keloid recurrence after surgical excision with prospective longitudinal scar assessment scales

Summary Introduction Evaluation tools are used to quantify scar evolution and determine treatment effectiveness. In clinical practice, scar assessment scales are less costly, tend to cover a greater number of aspects related to scar characteristics and can incorporate a patient's opinion in the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2012-07, Vol.65 (7), p.e175-e181
Hauptverfasser: Furtado, F, Hochman, B, Ferreira, L.M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Introduction Evaluation tools are used to quantify scar evolution and determine treatment effectiveness. In clinical practice, scar assessment scales are less costly, tend to cover a greater number of aspects related to scar characteristics and can incorporate a patient's opinion in the assessment. However, the scales have not yet been used as an evaluation method for the postoperative recurrence of keloids. Objective The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of scar rating scales for keloid recurrence after surgical excision. Methods Patients ( n  = 25) with keloids on the trunk were treated by surgical resection and postoperative beta radiation therapy. On the 3rd, 6th, 9th and 12th postoperative months, two specialists classified the lesions qualitatively in recurrent and non-recurrent cases. Furthermore, in the objective evaluation, the items on the Seattle Scar Scale (SSS) and the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES) were assessed by specialists, and the patients assessed items on the Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS) for the pre- and postoperative periods. The scars were classified qualitatively as “good” or “poor.” Results Recurrence was observed in 18 patients (72%), according to the specialists' qualitative assessments. The best scores on the SSS and SBSES were given to the non-recurrent ( p  
ISSN:1748-6815
1878-0539
DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2012.02.005