A comparative study of ultrafiltration and physicochemical process as pretreatment of seawater reverse osmosis

The effectiveness of two pretreatments for open intake seawater reverse osmosis (RO), aerated spiral wound ultrafiltration (ASWUF) and physicochemical (PC) pretreatment, were evaluated. Their efficiency in removing particulate materials was assessed by SDI, turbidity and Particle Size Distribution....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Desalination and water treatment 2012-04, Vol.42 (1-3), p.73-79
Hauptverfasser: FERNANDEZ, Gloria, PLAZA, Fidel, GARRALON, Gloria, GARRALON, Antonio, PEREZ, Jorge Ignacio, GOMEZ, Migual Angel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The effectiveness of two pretreatments for open intake seawater reverse osmosis (RO), aerated spiral wound ultrafiltration (ASWUF) and physicochemical (PC) pretreatment, were evaluated. Their efficiency in removing particulate materials was assessed by SDI, turbidity and Particle Size Distribution. Aerobic bacteria levels indicated the effectiveness of bacterial removal. Organic matter was characterized by TOC and UV254. The apparent molecular weight (MW) distribution of organic matter was determined by centrifugal ultrafiltration fractionation and the effect of pretreated effl uent on seawater RO flux decline was evaluated by a bench-scale test. Both pretreatments lowered feed water SDI to 2 and turbidity to 0.4 NTU and were highly efficient in removing particles larger than 1 μm. In general, ASWUF was more effective than PC, although PC removed TOC more effi ciently. For both pretreatments, TOC fractions with a MW of under 3 kDa remained in treated water. Both pretreatments made effl uents of excellent microbiological quality; however aerobic bacteria were isolated depending on the level of residual chlorine. Specific flux decline was slightly higher for seawater pretreated with PC and SEM revealed the presence of several foulants. Special care must be taken to prevent the contamination of the pretreated water zone (tanks, pipes...) in order to maintain the quality of influent to RO membranes.
ISSN:1944-3994
1944-3986
DOI:10.1080/19443994.2012.683142