Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in assessing peri-implant bone defect regeneration: a histologically controlled study in dogs
Objective: To assess the accuracy of cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) in terms of buccal bone‐wall configuration and peri‐implant bone defect regeneration after guided bone regeneration (GBR). Material and methods: Titanium implants were inserted into standardized box‐shaped defects in the mandi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical oral implants research 2012-07, Vol.23 (7), p.882-887 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective: To assess the accuracy of cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) in terms of buccal bone‐wall configuration and peri‐implant bone defect regeneration after guided bone regeneration (GBR).
Material and methods: Titanium implants were inserted into standardized box‐shaped defects in the mandible of 12 foxhounds. Defects of one side were augmented following the principle of GBR, while the other side was left untreated. Radiological evaluation was performed using CBCT and compared with histomorphometrical measurements of the respective site serving as a validation method.
Results: Non‐augmented control sites providing a horizontal bone width (BW) of0.5 mm (0.7 ± 0.7 mm) (P0.05, Mann–Whitney U‐test). However, a radiological discrimination between original bone, integrated and non‐integrated bone substitute material was not reliable. Additionally, it was found that a minimum buccal BW of 0.5 mm was necessary for the detection of bone in radiology.
Conclusion: The evaluation of peri‐implant bone defect regeneration by means of CBCT is not accurate for sites providing a BW of |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0905-7161 1600-0501 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02232.x |