Accuracy of fit of 3-to-3 retainers after adhesive fixation using a neodymium–iron–boron magnet chain

Background and objective Six-base retainers are often used to prevent tertiary crowding. To minimize shear stress on the retainer, these should be fitted as precisely as possible. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of fit of 6-base retainers after adhesive fixation using a neodymium–i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of orofacial orthopedics 2011-10, Vol.72 (5), p.381-388
Hauptverfasser: Hahn, W., Wasser-Merkel, W., Lange, K., Gruber, R.M., Kubein-Meesenburg, D., Ihlow, D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 388
container_issue 5
container_start_page 381
container_title Journal of orofacial orthopedics
container_volume 72
creator Hahn, W.
Wasser-Merkel, W.
Lange, K.
Gruber, R.M.
Kubein-Meesenburg, D.
Ihlow, D.
description Background and objective Six-base retainers are often used to prevent tertiary crowding. To minimize shear stress on the retainer, these should be fitted as precisely as possible. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of fit of 6-base retainers after adhesive fixation using a neodymium–iron–boron (NdFeB) magnet chain or a resin positioning aid. Materials and methods A 6-base retainer was prepared for 40 pseudo-anonymous lower jaw models (2 × 20). Temporary fixation was performed with a resin positioning aid or a NdFeB magnet chain. The adhesive fixation of the retainers was randomized. The area and vertical distance between wire and teeth were determined by histomorphometry. The results were evaluated by ANOVA. The probability of error was specified as 5%. Results With the magnetic chain method, the area was significantly smaller than with the positioning aid (p = 0.0125). The difference between the two methods was ca. 1.3 mm 2 . Moreover, the measured distance was affected significantly by the method used (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00056-011-0042-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1018861178</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1018861178</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-fd388c19183168b6952fa46f1719da1a9c1fd0ed7d23cd35477b9aef9da9dd3f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOAyEUhonRaL08gBvD0g3KGWZgWBrjLWniRteEcqk0nUFhxtid7-Ab-iTStLp09ZOc7_zhfAidAr0ASsVlppQ2nFAAQmldEbaDJsChIVxAvVveNatJU0l2gA5zXqzpmvJ9dFCBFI2QzQSFK2PGpM0KR499GNbByBAJw8kNOvQuZaz94BLW9sXl8O4K9qGHEHs85tDPsca9i3bVhbH7_vwKKfYlZrEk7vS8dwM2L6XoGO15vczuZJtH6Pn25un6nkwf7x6ur6bEVBUfiLesbQ1IaBnwdsZlU3ldcw8CpNWgpQFvqbPCVsxY1tRCzKR2vgyltcyzI3S-6X1N8W10eVBdyMYtl7p8c8wKKLQtBxBtQWGDmhRzTs6r1xQ6nVYFUmvDamNYFcNqbVixsnO2rR9nnbN_G79KC1BtgFxG_dwltYhj6svJ_7T-AIMpiPk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1018861178</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accuracy of fit of 3-to-3 retainers after adhesive fixation using a neodymium–iron–boron magnet chain</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Hahn, W. ; Wasser-Merkel, W. ; Lange, K. ; Gruber, R.M. ; Kubein-Meesenburg, D. ; Ihlow, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hahn, W. ; Wasser-Merkel, W. ; Lange, K. ; Gruber, R.M. ; Kubein-Meesenburg, D. ; Ihlow, D.</creatorcontrib><description>Background and objective Six-base retainers are often used to prevent tertiary crowding. To minimize shear stress on the retainer, these should be fitted as precisely as possible. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of fit of 6-base retainers after adhesive fixation using a neodymium–iron–boron (NdFeB) magnet chain or a resin positioning aid. Materials and methods A 6-base retainer was prepared for 40 pseudo-anonymous lower jaw models (2 × 20). Temporary fixation was performed with a resin positioning aid or a NdFeB magnet chain. The adhesive fixation of the retainers was randomized. The area and vertical distance between wire and teeth were determined by histomorphometry. The results were evaluated by ANOVA. The probability of error was specified as 5%. Results With the magnetic chain method, the area was significantly smaller than with the positioning aid (p = 0.0125). The difference between the two methods was ca. 1.3 mm 2 . Moreover, the measured distance was affected significantly by the method used (p &lt; 0.0002). With the magnet chain, the distance between the tooth and retainer was reduced by a mean of 0.05 mm. Conclusion The fit of the retainer wire improves somewhat when the NdFeB magnet chain is used even though the wire is not as precisely positioned as it would be with a custom-made positioning aid.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1434-5293</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-6714</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00056-011-0042-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21975795</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Boron ; Dental Cements ; Dentistry ; Humans ; Iron ; Magnetics ; Medicine ; Models, Anatomic ; Neodymium ; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery ; Original Article ; Orthodontic Retainers - standards ; Orthodontic Wires ; Orthodontics - methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of orofacial orthopedics, 2011-10, Vol.72 (5), p.381-388</ispartof><rights>Urban &amp; Vogel, Muenchen 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-fd388c19183168b6952fa46f1719da1a9c1fd0ed7d23cd35477b9aef9da9dd3f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00056-011-0042-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00056-011-0042-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21975795$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hahn, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasser-Merkel, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lange, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruber, R.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubein-Meesenburg, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ihlow, D.</creatorcontrib><title>Accuracy of fit of 3-to-3 retainers after adhesive fixation using a neodymium–iron–boron magnet chain</title><title>Journal of orofacial orthopedics</title><addtitle>J Orofac Orthop</addtitle><addtitle>J Orofac Orthop</addtitle><description>Background and objective Six-base retainers are often used to prevent tertiary crowding. To minimize shear stress on the retainer, these should be fitted as precisely as possible. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of fit of 6-base retainers after adhesive fixation using a neodymium–iron–boron (NdFeB) magnet chain or a resin positioning aid. Materials and methods A 6-base retainer was prepared for 40 pseudo-anonymous lower jaw models (2 × 20). Temporary fixation was performed with a resin positioning aid or a NdFeB magnet chain. The adhesive fixation of the retainers was randomized. The area and vertical distance between wire and teeth were determined by histomorphometry. The results were evaluated by ANOVA. The probability of error was specified as 5%. Results With the magnetic chain method, the area was significantly smaller than with the positioning aid (p = 0.0125). The difference between the two methods was ca. 1.3 mm 2 . Moreover, the measured distance was affected significantly by the method used (p &lt; 0.0002). With the magnet chain, the distance between the tooth and retainer was reduced by a mean of 0.05 mm. Conclusion The fit of the retainer wire improves somewhat when the NdFeB magnet chain is used even though the wire is not as precisely positioned as it would be with a custom-made positioning aid.</description><subject>Boron</subject><subject>Dental Cements</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>Magnetics</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Models, Anatomic</subject><subject>Neodymium</subject><subject>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Orthodontic Retainers - standards</subject><subject>Orthodontic Wires</subject><subject>Orthodontics - methods</subject><issn>1434-5293</issn><issn>1615-6714</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOAyEUhonRaL08gBvD0g3KGWZgWBrjLWniRteEcqk0nUFhxtid7-Ab-iTStLp09ZOc7_zhfAidAr0ASsVlppQ2nFAAQmldEbaDJsChIVxAvVveNatJU0l2gA5zXqzpmvJ9dFCBFI2QzQSFK2PGpM0KR499GNbByBAJw8kNOvQuZaz94BLW9sXl8O4K9qGHEHs85tDPsca9i3bVhbH7_vwKKfYlZrEk7vS8dwM2L6XoGO15vczuZJtH6Pn25un6nkwf7x6ur6bEVBUfiLesbQ1IaBnwdsZlU3ldcw8CpNWgpQFvqbPCVsxY1tRCzKR2vgyltcyzI3S-6X1N8W10eVBdyMYtl7p8c8wKKLQtBxBtQWGDmhRzTs6r1xQ6nVYFUmvDamNYFcNqbVixsnO2rR9nnbN_G79KC1BtgFxG_dwltYhj6svJ_7T-AIMpiPk</recordid><startdate>20111001</startdate><enddate>20111001</enddate><creator>Hahn, W.</creator><creator>Wasser-Merkel, W.</creator><creator>Lange, K.</creator><creator>Gruber, R.M.</creator><creator>Kubein-Meesenburg, D.</creator><creator>Ihlow, D.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111001</creationdate><title>Accuracy of fit of 3-to-3 retainers after adhesive fixation using a neodymium–iron–boron magnet chain</title><author>Hahn, W. ; Wasser-Merkel, W. ; Lange, K. ; Gruber, R.M. ; Kubein-Meesenburg, D. ; Ihlow, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-fd388c19183168b6952fa46f1719da1a9c1fd0ed7d23cd35477b9aef9da9dd3f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Boron</topic><topic>Dental Cements</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>Magnetics</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Models, Anatomic</topic><topic>Neodymium</topic><topic>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Orthodontic Retainers - standards</topic><topic>Orthodontic Wires</topic><topic>Orthodontics - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hahn, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasser-Merkel, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lange, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruber, R.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubein-Meesenburg, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ihlow, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of orofacial orthopedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hahn, W.</au><au>Wasser-Merkel, W.</au><au>Lange, K.</au><au>Gruber, R.M.</au><au>Kubein-Meesenburg, D.</au><au>Ihlow, D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accuracy of fit of 3-to-3 retainers after adhesive fixation using a neodymium–iron–boron magnet chain</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orofacial orthopedics</jtitle><stitle>J Orofac Orthop</stitle><addtitle>J Orofac Orthop</addtitle><date>2011-10-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>381</spage><epage>388</epage><pages>381-388</pages><issn>1434-5293</issn><eissn>1615-6714</eissn><abstract>Background and objective Six-base retainers are often used to prevent tertiary crowding. To minimize shear stress on the retainer, these should be fitted as precisely as possible. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of fit of 6-base retainers after adhesive fixation using a neodymium–iron–boron (NdFeB) magnet chain or a resin positioning aid. Materials and methods A 6-base retainer was prepared for 40 pseudo-anonymous lower jaw models (2 × 20). Temporary fixation was performed with a resin positioning aid or a NdFeB magnet chain. The adhesive fixation of the retainers was randomized. The area and vertical distance between wire and teeth were determined by histomorphometry. The results were evaluated by ANOVA. The probability of error was specified as 5%. Results With the magnetic chain method, the area was significantly smaller than with the positioning aid (p = 0.0125). The difference between the two methods was ca. 1.3 mm 2 . Moreover, the measured distance was affected significantly by the method used (p &lt; 0.0002). With the magnet chain, the distance between the tooth and retainer was reduced by a mean of 0.05 mm. Conclusion The fit of the retainer wire improves somewhat when the NdFeB magnet chain is used even though the wire is not as precisely positioned as it would be with a custom-made positioning aid.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>21975795</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00056-011-0042-3</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1434-5293
ispartof Journal of orofacial orthopedics, 2011-10, Vol.72 (5), p.381-388
issn 1434-5293
1615-6714
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1018861178
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Boron
Dental Cements
Dentistry
Humans
Iron
Magnetics
Medicine
Models, Anatomic
Neodymium
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Original Article
Orthodontic Retainers - standards
Orthodontic Wires
Orthodontics - methods
title Accuracy of fit of 3-to-3 retainers after adhesive fixation using a neodymium–iron–boron magnet chain
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T03%3A43%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy%20of%20fit%20of%203-to-3%20retainers%20after%20adhesive%20fixation%20using%20a%20neodymium%E2%80%93iron%E2%80%93boron%20magnet%20chain&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orofacial%20orthopedics&rft.au=Hahn,%20W.&rft.date=2011-10-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=381&rft.epage=388&rft.pages=381-388&rft.issn=1434-5293&rft.eissn=1615-6714&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00056-011-0042-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1018861178%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1018861178&rft_id=info:pmid/21975795&rfr_iscdi=true