Accuracy of fit of 3-to-3 retainers after adhesive fixation using a neodymium–iron–boron magnet chain

Background and objective Six-base retainers are often used to prevent tertiary crowding. To minimize shear stress on the retainer, these should be fitted as precisely as possible. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of fit of 6-base retainers after adhesive fixation using a neodymium–i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of orofacial orthopedics 2011-10, Vol.72 (5), p.381-388
Hauptverfasser: Hahn, W., Wasser-Merkel, W., Lange, K., Gruber, R.M., Kubein-Meesenburg, D., Ihlow, D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and objective Six-base retainers are often used to prevent tertiary crowding. To minimize shear stress on the retainer, these should be fitted as precisely as possible. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of fit of 6-base retainers after adhesive fixation using a neodymium–iron–boron (NdFeB) magnet chain or a resin positioning aid. Materials and methods A 6-base retainer was prepared for 40 pseudo-anonymous lower jaw models (2 × 20). Temporary fixation was performed with a resin positioning aid or a NdFeB magnet chain. The adhesive fixation of the retainers was randomized. The area and vertical distance between wire and teeth were determined by histomorphometry. The results were evaluated by ANOVA. The probability of error was specified as 5%. Results With the magnetic chain method, the area was significantly smaller than with the positioning aid (p = 0.0125). The difference between the two methods was ca. 1.3 mm 2 . Moreover, the measured distance was affected significantly by the method used (p 
ISSN:1434-5293
1615-6714
DOI:10.1007/s00056-011-0042-3