Diagnostic accuracy of visual urethral mobility exam versus Q-Tip test: a randomized crossover trial

Objective The objective of the study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of a visual urethral mobility examination (VUME) with a Q-Tip test in the assessment of urethral hypermobility. Study Design Subjects were randomized to a VUME or Q-Tip test first, followed by the alternate assessment. Outco...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2012-06, Vol.206 (6), p.528.e1-528.e6
Hauptverfasser: Robinson, Barbara Lynn, MD, Geller, Elizabeth Joanne, MD, Parnell, Brent Ashley, MD, Crane, Andrea Kuntaraf, MD, Jannelli, Mary Lee, MD, Wells, Ellen Casper, MD, Connolly, AnnaMarie, MD, Matthews, Catherine Ann, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective The objective of the study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of a visual urethral mobility examination (VUME) with a Q-Tip test in the assessment of urethral hypermobility. Study Design Subjects were randomized to a VUME or Q-Tip test first, followed by the alternate assessment. Outcomes included hypermobile, not hypermobile, or indeterminate. Hypermobility was defined as 30° or greater from the horizontal. Pain perception and test preference were assessed. Results For the 54 subjects, 61.1% demonstrated hypermobility on VUME vs 72.2% on the Q-Tip test ( P = .39). Assessment of hypermobility was correlated between the 2 tools (ρ = 0.47, P = .001). Positive and negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity for VUME were 88%, 56%, 78%, and 71%, respectively, with a Q-Tip test as the reference standard. Mean pain score on visual analog scale was 0.72 for VUME and 3.15 for Q-tip test ( P < .001). VUME was preferred by 83% of subjects. Conclusion VUME is a diagnostic alternative to the Q-Tip test for the assessment of urethral hypermobility and is preferred by subjects.
ISSN:0002-9378
1097-6868
DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2012.02.015