Evaluation of Vickers hardness of different types of acrylic denture base resins with and without glass fibre reinforcement
doi: 10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2010.00435.x Evaluation of Vickers hardness of different types of acrylic denture base resins with and without glass fibre reinforcement Objective: To evaluate the Vickers hardness of different acrylic resins for denture bases with and without the addition of glass fibres...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gerodontology 2012-06, Vol.29 (2), p.e155-e160 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | doi: 10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2010.00435.x
Evaluation of Vickers hardness of different types of acrylic denture base resins with and without glass fibre reinforcement
Objective: To evaluate the Vickers hardness of different acrylic resins for denture bases with and without the addition of glass fibres.
Background: It has been suggested that different polymerisation methods, as well as the addition of glass fibre (FV) might improve the hardness of acrylic.
Materials and methods: Five types of acrylic resin were tested: Vipi Wave (VW), microwave polymerisation; Vipi Flash (VF), auto‐polymerisation; Lucitone (LT), QC20 (QC) and Vipi Cril (VC), conventional heat‐polymerisation, all with or without glass fibre reinforcement (GFR) and distributed into 10 groups (n = 12). Specimens were then submitted to Vickers hardness testing with a 25‐g load for 30 s. All data were submitted to anova and Tukey’s HSD test.
Results: A significant statistical difference was observed with regard to the polymerisation method and the GFR (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0734-0664 1741-2358 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2010.00435.x |