Outcomes in patients with Gleason score 8–10 prostate cancer: relation to preoperative PSA level

Study Type – Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? High‐grade prostate cancers are associated with poor disease‐specific outcomes. A proportion of these tumours produce little PSA. This study demonstrates that among Gleason 8–10 pros...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BJU international 2012-06, Vol.109 (12), p.1764-1769
Hauptverfasser: McGuire, Barry B., Helfand, Brian T., Loeb, Stacy, Hu, Qiaoyan, O'Brien, Daniel, Cooper, Phillip, Yang, Ximing, Catalona, William J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Study Type – Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? High‐grade prostate cancers are associated with poor disease‐specific outcomes. A proportion of these tumours produce little PSA. This study demonstrates that among Gleason 8–10 prostate cancers, some of the worst survival outcomes are associated with the lowest PSA levels. OBJECTIVE •  To assess outcomes of patients with Gleason score 8–10 prostate cancer (CaP) with a low (≤2.5 ng/mL) vs higher preoperative serum PSA levels. PATIENTS AND METHODS •  From 1983 to 2003, 5544 patients underwent open radical prostatectomy, of whom 354 had a Gleason 8–10 tumour in the prostatectomy specimen. •  Patients were stratified according to preoperative PSA level into four strata: ≤2.5 ng/mL (n= 31), 2.6–4 ng/mL (n= 31), 4.1–10 ng/mL (n= 174), and >10 ng/mL (n= 118). •  We compared biochemical progression‐free survival (PFS), metastasis‐free survival (MFS), and cancer‐specific survival (CSS) as a function of preoperative PSA level. RESULTS •  Patients with PSA level ≤2.5 ng/mL were more likely to have seminal vesicle invasion (P= 0.003). •  On Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, patients with a PSA level ≤2.5 ng/mL had proportionately worse outcomes than their counterparts with higher PSA levels. •  The 7‐year PFS in the PSA ≤2.5 ng/mL stratum was lower than those of the PSA 2.6–4 ng/mL and 4–10 ng/mL strata (36% vs 50 and 42%, respectively); however, the lowest 7‐year PFS was found in those with a PSA level >10 ng/mL (32%, P= 0.02). •  Gleason score 8–10 tumours with a PSA level ≤2.5 ng/mL also tended to have the lowest 7‐year MFS (75, 93, 89 and 92% for PSA level ≤2.5, 2.6–4, 4.1–10 and >10 ng/mL, respectively, P= 0.2) and CSS (81, 100, 94 and 90% for PSA level ≤2.5, 2.6–4, 4.1–10 and >10 ng/mL, respectively, P= 0.3), although these differences were not statistically significant. •  In the subset with palpable disease, Gleason grade 8–10 disease with PSA level ≤2.5 ng/mL also was associated with a worse prognosis. CONCLUSIONS •  In patients with Gleason grade 8–10 disease, a proportion of these tumours are so poorly differentiated that they produce relatively little PSA. •  Patients with high‐grade, low‐PSA tumours had less favourable outcomes than many of those with higher PSA levels.
ISSN:1464-4096
1464-410X
DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10628.x