Detection of Anal Sphincter Defects in Female Patients With Fecal Incontinence: A Comparison of 3-Dimensional Transperineal Ultrasound and 2-Dimensional Endoanal Ultrasound
BACKGROUND:Endoanal ultrasound is widely used for the detection of external and internal anal sphincter defects in patients with fecal incontinence. Recently, 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasound has been introduced as a noninvasive imaging method for the detection of these sphincter defects. OBJE...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diseases of the colon & rectum 2012-06, Vol.55 (6), p.646-652 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | BACKGROUND:Endoanal ultrasound is widely used for the detection of external and internal anal sphincter defects in patients with fecal incontinence. Recently, 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasound has been introduced as a noninvasive imaging method for the detection of these sphincter defects.
OBJECTIVE:This study was designed to assess agreement between 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasound and 2-dimensional endoanal ultrasound regarding the detection of anal sphincter defects in women with fecal incontinence.
DESIGN:This study was designed as a prospective observational study.
SETTINGS:The study took place in a university hospital.
PATIENTS:Between October 2008 and June 2009, all women with concerns of fecal incontinence underwent 2-dimensional endoanal ultrasound as well as 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasound.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:The main outcome measures are the presence of external and internal anal sphincter defects.
RESULTS:Fifty-five patients were included. External and internal anal sphincter defects were observed with 2-dimensional endoanal ultrasound in 27 (49%) and 15 (27%) patients. Three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound detected an external and internal sphincter defect in 19 (35%) and 16 (29%) patients. The Cohen κ coefficient for the detection of external (κ = 0.63) and internal (κ = 0.78) anal sphincter defects was good.
LIMITATIONS:This study’s limitations include the absence of a surgical examination as the reference standard in the determination of sphincter defects.
CONCLUSION:This study shows good agreement between 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasound and 2-dimensional endoanal ultrasound regarding the detection of anal sphincter defects. Based on these data, 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasound might be considered as a valuable alternative noninvasive investigation method. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0012-3706 1530-0358 |
DOI: | 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318251dca1 |