Detection of Anal Sphincter Defects in Female Patients With Fecal Incontinence: A Comparison of 3-Dimensional Transperineal Ultrasound and 2-Dimensional Endoanal Ultrasound

BACKGROUND:Endoanal ultrasound is widely used for the detection of external and internal anal sphincter defects in patients with fecal incontinence. Recently, 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasound has been introduced as a noninvasive imaging method for the detection of these sphincter defects. OBJE...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diseases of the colon & rectum 2012-06, Vol.55 (6), p.646-652
Hauptverfasser: Oom, Daniëlla M J, West, Rachel L, Schouten, W Rudolph, Steensma, Anneke B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND:Endoanal ultrasound is widely used for the detection of external and internal anal sphincter defects in patients with fecal incontinence. Recently, 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasound has been introduced as a noninvasive imaging method for the detection of these sphincter defects. OBJECTIVE:This study was designed to assess agreement between 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasound and 2-dimensional endoanal ultrasound regarding the detection of anal sphincter defects in women with fecal incontinence. DESIGN:This study was designed as a prospective observational study. SETTINGS:The study took place in a university hospital. PATIENTS:Between October 2008 and June 2009, all women with concerns of fecal incontinence underwent 2-dimensional endoanal ultrasound as well as 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasound. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:The main outcome measures are the presence of external and internal anal sphincter defects. RESULTS:Fifty-five patients were included. External and internal anal sphincter defects were observed with 2-dimensional endoanal ultrasound in 27 (49%) and 15 (27%) patients. Three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound detected an external and internal sphincter defect in 19 (35%) and 16 (29%) patients. The Cohen κ coefficient for the detection of external (κ = 0.63) and internal (κ = 0.78) anal sphincter defects was good. LIMITATIONS:This study’s limitations include the absence of a surgical examination as the reference standard in the determination of sphincter defects. CONCLUSION:This study shows good agreement between 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasound and 2-dimensional endoanal ultrasound regarding the detection of anal sphincter defects. Based on these data, 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasound might be considered as a valuable alternative noninvasive investigation method.
ISSN:0012-3706
1530-0358
DOI:10.1097/DCR.0b013e318251dca1