Frequency of heparin/platelet factor 4-dependent platelet antibodies in patients undergoing angioplasty and stenting for cardiovascular disease and their role for on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity

Background The frequency of heparin-induced platelet antibodies (H/PF4 antibodies) following heparin exposure during percutaneous intervention with stent implantation is unknown. These antibodies may activate platelets and therefore contribute to high on-clopidogrel residual platelet reactivity (HRP...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical research in cardiology 2012-06, Vol.101 (6), p.445-452
Hauptverfasser: Gremmel, Thomas, Frühwirth, Karin, Kopp, Christoph W., Kaider, Alexandra, Steiner, Sabine, Bakchoul, Tamam, Sachs, Ulrich J. H., Koppensteiner, Renate, Panzer, Simon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The frequency of heparin-induced platelet antibodies (H/PF4 antibodies) following heparin exposure during percutaneous intervention with stent implantation is unknown. These antibodies may activate platelets and therefore contribute to high on-clopidogrel residual platelet reactivity (HRPR). Methods We screened 288 patients after angioplasty and stenting for H/PF4 antibodies by an IgG/A/M ELISA. The 44 (15.3%) positive samples were further evaluated for IgG only antibodies, by the particle gel immunoassay (PaGIA), the heparin induced platelet activation assay (HIPA) and MEA. Further, we determined on-treatment platelet reactivity by multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) in these patients. In vivo platelet activation was assessed by P-selectin expression. Results The prevalence of H/PF4 antibodies in the total patients’ cohort was 15.3% (95% CI 11.3–20%) by the IgG/A/M ELISA, 9.4% (95% CI 6.3–13.4%) by the IgG ELISA, 11.5% (95% CI 8–15.7%) by PaGIA, 14.2% (95% CI 10.4–18.8%) by MEA, and 2.4% (95% CI 1–4.9%) by HIPA. On-treatment platelet reactivity was similar between patients without and with H/PF4 antibodies [39 AU (6–110 AU) vs. 41 AU (7–91 AU); P  = 0.85]. HRPR was seen in 105 patients (37.5%), and occurred to a similar extent in patients without and with H/PF4 antibodies in all test systems (all P  > 0.2). Further, there was no difference of the ELISA optical densities using the IgG/A/M or the IgG only ELISA between patients without or with HRPR (all P  > 0.3). There was no significant difference of P-selectin expression between patients without or with H/PF4 antibodies ( P  = 0.97). Noteworthy, none of the patients who developed H/PF4 antibodies had heparin-induced thrombocytopenia or a thromboembolic event. Conclusion H/PF4 antibodies are not rare in patients undergoing angioplasty and stenting. However, these antibodies are not associated with the occurrence of HRPR.
ISSN:1861-0684
1861-0692
DOI:10.1007/s00392-011-0411-3