Ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel pharmacokinetics with a low-dose transdermal contraceptive delivery system, AG200-15: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract Background This study evaluated the ethinyl estradiol (EE) and levonorgestrel (LNG) pharmacokinetic profiles of AG200-15, a transdermal contraceptive delivery system, compared with a combination oral contraceptive (COC) containing EE 35 mcg and norgestimate 250 mcg. Study design A Phase 1,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Contraception (Stoneham) 2012-06, Vol.85 (6), p.595-601 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract Background This study evaluated the ethinyl estradiol (EE) and levonorgestrel (LNG) pharmacokinetic profiles of AG200-15, a transdermal contraceptive delivery system, compared with a combination oral contraceptive (COC) containing EE 35 mcg and norgestimate 250 mcg. Study design A Phase 1, open-label, single-center study in 36 healthy women was conducted over three cycles with a randomized crossover design. After a run-in cycle of 21 days on and 7 days off with AG200-15, participants were randomized to receive one of two treatments: a 21/7-day cycle of AG200-15 either followed or preceded by one cycle of the COC. This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT01243580. Results During the third week of AG200-15 use, mean (±standard deviation) maximum serum concentration ( Cmax ), area under the curve0–168 h and steady-state concentration ( Css48–168 h ) for EE were 51.3±17.3 pg/mL, 6.26±2.46 ng h/mL and 35.7±14.5 pg/mL, respectively; for LNG, the corresponding values were 2400±1140 pg/mL, 317±159 ng h/mL and 1847±930 pg/mL, respectively. The AG200-15 EE Cmax was approximately 60% lower and the EE Css was 15%–20% lower than those obtained with the COC. The calculated daily dose of AG200-15 was equivalent to a 30-mcg EE COC. The most common adverse events (AEs; >10%) in the AG200-15 group were headache, nausea and application-site irritation. All drug-related AEs were mild, and no serious AEs were reported. Conclusions EE and LNG daily exposure during AG200-15 treatment was within the range reported for a low-dose COC. The daily EE dose with AG 200-15 was equivalent to a 30-mcg COC and was safe and well tolerated. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0010-7824 1879-0518 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.10.006 |