Comparison of different solar plants based on parabolic trough technology

► Conventional solar plants achieves an overall efficiency of 15.3%. ► Solar salts increases efficiency with crystallization issues as drawback. ► Innovative lay-outs were investigated aiming at higher efficiency and lower costs. ► Innovative lay-out increases efficiency by 16% compared to reference cases. Solar thermal plants are among the most promising technologies to replace fossil fuel stationary applications, and within solar thermal technologies, parabolic troughs are considered the most mature application in the market. This paper compares different solar field technologies, in terms of both performance at design conditions and annual energy production; an in-house code, PATTO, was used to perform energy balances. We considered a reference case reflecting state-of-the-art Nevada Solar One, which showed a design efficiency and annual average efficiency of 22.4% and 15.3%, respectively, in agreement with actual performance. If solar salts are used as heat-transfer fluid instead of synthetic oil (e.g. ARCHIMEDE plant), the efficiency improved within the range of 6% due to the higher maximum temperature. Further thermodynamic advantages can be achieved with a direct steam generation plant; the main drawback is the more complex transient control and no commercially available storage systems. We propose the innovative Milan configuration, which combines advantages of direct steam evaporation and the use of a heat-transfer fluid, to investigate both synthetic oil and solar salts for steam superheating and reheating. Results for this configuration are very promising, with a sun-to-electric annual average efficiency of 17.8%, which is 16% higher than the reference case. Detailed daily simulations showed that advantages are more significant at low radiation. However, the plant should be optimized on an economic basis and we will discuss this in a future paper.