Asian consensus report on functional dyspepsia

Background and Aim:  Environmental factors such as food, lifestyle and prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection are widely different in Asian countries compared with the West, and physiological functions and genetic factors of Asians may also be different from those of Westerners. Establishing an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 2012-04, Vol.27 (4), p.626-641
Hauptverfasser: Miwa, Hiroto, Ghoshal, Uday Chand, Fock, Kwong Ming, Gonlachanvit, Sutep, Gwee, Kok-Ann, Ang, Tiing-Leong, Chang, Full-Young, Hongo, Michio, Hou, Xiaohua, Kachintorn, Udom, Ke, Meiyun, Lai, Kwok-Hung, Lee, Kwang Jae, Lu, Ching-Liang, Mahadeva, Sanjiv, Miura, Soichiro, Park, Hyojin, Rhee, Poong-Lyul, Sugano, Kentaro, Vilaichone, Ratha-korn, Wong, Benjamin C Y, Bak, Young-Tae
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and Aim:  Environmental factors such as food, lifestyle and prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection are widely different in Asian countries compared with the West, and physiological functions and genetic factors of Asians may also be different from those of Westerners. Establishing an Asian consensus for functional dyspepsia is crucial in order to attract attention to such data from Asian countries, to articulate the experience and views of Asian experts, and to provide a relevant guide on management of functional dyspepsia for primary care physicians working in Asia. Methods:  Consensus team members were selected from Asian experts and consensus development was carried out by using a modified Delphi method. Consensus teams collected published papers on functional dyspepsia especially from Asia and developed candidate consensus statements based on the generated clinical questions. At the first face‐to‐face meeting, each statement was reviewed and e‐mail voting was done twice. At the second face‐to‐face meeting, final voting on each statement was done using a keypad voting system. A grade of evidence and strength of recommendation were applied to each statement according to the method of the GRADE Working Group. Results:  Twenty‐nine consensus statements were finalized, including seven for definition and diagnosis, five for epidemiology, nine for pathophysiology, and eight for management. Algorithms for diagnosis and management of functional dyspepsia were added. Conclusions:  This consensus developed by Asian experts shows distinctive features of functional dyspepsia in Asia and will provide a guide to the diagnosis and management of functional dyspepsia for Asian primary care physicians.
ISSN:0815-9319
1440-1746
DOI:10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.07037.x