Usefulness of endoscopic radial incision and cutting method for refractory esophagogastric anastomotic stricture (with video)
Background There is no effective treatment for gastroesophageal anastomotic strictures that are refractory to repeated endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD). However, EBD is still selected worldwide to manage such refractory strictures. To relieve the symptoms of dysphagia and keep a wide lumen, we deve...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2012-05, Vol.75 (5), p.965-972 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background There is no effective treatment for gastroesophageal anastomotic strictures that are refractory to repeated endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD). However, EBD is still selected worldwide to manage such refractory strictures. To relieve the symptoms of dysphagia and keep a wide lumen, we developed a new incisional treatment, radial incision and cutting (RIC). Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the RIC method for the treatment of refractory anastomotic strictures. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting National Cancer Center and University Hospital. Patients This study involved 54 consecutive patients with refractory anastomotic stricture after esophagogastric surgery. Intervention RIC. Main Outcome Measurements The safety and clinical success of RIC and the long-term patency after RIC compared with those of continued EBD. Results The median procedure time of RIC was 14 minutes (range, 4–40 minutes). No serious adverse events associated with RIC were observed. Immediately after RIC, 81.3% (26/32) of patients were able to eat solid food without symptoms of dysphagia. As a short-term effect, the dysphagia improved after RIC in 93.8% (30/32) of the patients. As a long-term effect, 63% (17/27) and 62% (13/21) of patients were able to eat solid food 6 and 12 months after RIC, respectively. The 6-month and 12-month patency rates were significantly different between the RIC group and the continued EBD group (65.3% vs 19.8%, P < .005; 61.5% vs 19.8%, P < .005). Limitations Nonrandomized retrospective study. Conclusions RIC is an effective and safe method. The demonstration of the validity of this method may place RIC as a new medical treatment for patients with refractory stricture after surgical resection for esophagogastric diseases. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0016-5107 1097-6779 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.gie.2012.01.012 |