The use of a tailored surgical technique for minimally invasive esophagectomy

Objective Uncertainty exists among surgeons as to whether minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is a comparable operation to open esophagectomy (OE). The surgical technique and oncologic dissection should not be degraded when using a minimally invasive approach. Methods We reviewed a single hospita...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2012-05, Vol.143 (5), p.1125-1129
Hauptverfasser: Javidfar, Jeffrey, MD, Bacchetta, Matthew, MD, Yang, Jonathan A., MD, MPH, Miller, Joanna, BS, D’Ovidio, Frank, MD, PhD, Ginsburg, Mark E., MD, Gorenstein, Lyall A., MD, Bessler, Marc, MD, Sonett, Joshua R., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective Uncertainty exists among surgeons as to whether minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is a comparable operation to open esophagectomy (OE). The surgical technique and oncologic dissection should not be degraded when using a minimally invasive approach. Methods We reviewed a single hospital’s experience with both OE and MIE. From 2000 to 2010, 257 patients underwent esophagectomy by 1 of 3 surgical techniques: transhiatal, Ivor Lewis, or 3-hole. Results Of the 257 patients (median age, 67 years; range, 58–74), 92 underwent MIE. Both groups were comparable in terms of gender, age, comorbidities, surgical technique, and induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The overall median follow-up was 29.5 months (range, 9.9–61.5). The MIE group had a significantly shorter operative time (MIE vs OE, 330 vs 365 minutes, P  = .04), length of stay (MIE vs OE, 9 vs 12 days, P  
ISSN:0022-5223
1097-685X
DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.01.071