Occipital Nerve Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment: A Multi-Center Study Evaluating Predictors of Outcome

Objective.  Occipital neuralgia (ON) is a challenging condition for which there is no reference standard for treatment. The purpose of this study was to provide outcome data on the largest study to date evaluating pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) for ON and to determine whether any demographic, clinical,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) Mass.), 2012-04, Vol.13 (4), p.489-497
Hauptverfasser: Huang, Julie H. Y., Galvagno Jr, Samuel M., Hameed, Mariam, Wilkinson, Indy, Erdek, Michael A., Patel, Amit, Buckenmaier III, Chester, Rosenberg, Jason, Cohen, Steven P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective.  Occipital neuralgia (ON) is a challenging condition for which there is no reference standard for treatment. The purpose of this study was to provide outcome data on the largest study to date evaluating pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) for ON and to determine whether any demographic, clinical, or treatment characteristics are associated with success. Design.  Retrospective data analysis was conducted in 102 subjects evaluating the effect of myriad factors on treatment success. Setting.  This study was conducted in academic civilian and military pain treatment centers. Patients.  One hundred and two consecutive patients with a primary diagnosis of ON were treated with PRF of the greater and/or lesser occipital nerve. Outcome Measures.  A positive primary outcome was predefined as ≥50% pain relief lasting at least 3 months. The secondary outcome measure was procedural satisfaction. Results.  Fifty‐two (51%) patients experienced ≥50% pain relief and satisfaction with treatment lasting at least 3 months. Variables associated with a positive outcome included a traumatic inciting event (65.7% success rate; P = 0.03), lower diagnostic block volumes (odds ratio [OR]: 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62–0.82; P 
ISSN:1526-2375
1526-4637
DOI:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01348.x