Sonoelastography for 1786 non-palpable breast masses: diagnostic value in the decision to biopsy

Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic value of sonoelastography by correlation with histopathology compared with conventional ultrasound on the decision to biopsy. Methods Prospectively determined BI-RADS categories of conventional ultrasound and elasticity scores from strain sonoelastography of 178...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 2012-05, Vol.22 (5), p.1033-1040
Hauptverfasser: Yi, Ann, Cho, Nariya, Chang, Jung Min, Koo, Hye Ryoung, La Yun, Bo, Moon, Woo Kyung
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic value of sonoelastography by correlation with histopathology compared with conventional ultrasound on the decision to biopsy. Methods Prospectively determined BI-RADS categories of conventional ultrasound and elasticity scores from strain sonoelastography of 1786 non-palpable breast masses (1,523 benign and 263 malignant) in 1,538 women were correlated with histopathology. The sensitivity and specificity of two imaging techniques were compared regarding the decision to biopsy. We also investigated whether there was a subset of benign masses that were recommended for biopsy by B-mode ultrasound but that had a less than 2% malignancy rate with the addition of sonoelastography. Results The mean elasticity score of malignant lesions was higher than that of benign lesions (2.94 ± 1.10 vs. 1.78 ± 0.81) ( P  
ISSN:0938-7994
1432-1084
DOI:10.1007/s00330-011-2341-x