Investigation of the viscous potential using an MHD simulation

The viscous interaction between the solar wind and Earth's magnetosphere is extremely difficult to study through direct observations. The viscous contribution to the polar cap potential, the viscous potential, is typically swamped by the much larger reconnection potential or obscured by rapidly...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 2012-03, Vol.117 (A3), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Bruntz, R., Lopez, R. E., Wiltberger, M., Lyon, J. G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The viscous interaction between the solar wind and Earth's magnetosphere is extremely difficult to study through direct observations. The viscous contribution to the polar cap potential, the viscous potential, is typically swamped by the much larger reconnection potential or obscured by rapidly changing solar wind conditions. We used the Lyon‐Fedder‐Mobarry (LFM) magnetohydrodynamic simulation to study the response of the viscous potential to a variety of ideal conditions both in the solar wind and the ionosphere. We found that the viscous potential in LFM increases with either increasing solar wind density or velocity, with a relation that is similar to some previous empirical results in form but different in detail. The density dependence scales as n0.439 (in cm−3) and velocity scales as Vx1.33 (in km s−1). Combining these results with a reference value, the viscous potential in LFM can be predicted using the formula ΦV = (0.00431)n0.439Vx1.33 kV. We also found that the viscous potential changes inversely in relation to constant Pedersen conductivity in an idealized ionosphere, a result that was previously predicted for LFM but not explored until now. Key Points Using the LFM simulation, we can study the viscous potential directly In LFM, the viscous potential scales with solar wind velocity and density Results are similar to published empirical results but have key differences
ISSN:0148-0227
2169-9380
2156-2202
2169-9402
DOI:10.1029/2011JA017022