Harris v. Maricopa County Super Ct

The district court, separating the former state court employee's ten claims into contract-based claims, federal civil rights claims, and state civil rights claims "sharing a common nucleus of operative facts with the federal civil rights claims," found the basic civil rights claims, a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	The Urban lawyer 2011-10, Vol.43 (4), p.1116-1117
1. Verfasser:	Barnes, Tracy
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Appellate courts Attorneys Attorneys fees Case Notes Civil rights Defendants Federal court decisions Federal district courts Fees Plaintiffs State courts
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	The district court, separating the former state court employee's ten claims into contract-based claims, federal civil rights claims, and state civil rights claims "sharing a common nucleus of operative facts with the federal civil rights claims," found the basic civil rights claims, as well as defamation and tortious interference claims, to be nonfrivolous.
ISSN:	0042-0905 1942-6593