Foreign direct investment and institutional quality: Some empirical evidence

Based on a panel data analysis of 164 countries from 1996 to 2006, we examine the impact of institutional quality on foreign direct investment (FDI) levels and volatility. We find that good institutional quality matters to FDI. We provide evidence that institutional quality has a positive and signif...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International review of financial analysis 2012-01, Vol.21, p.81-89
Hauptverfasser: Buchanan, Bonnie G., Le, Quan V., Rishi, Meenakshi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Based on a panel data analysis of 164 countries from 1996 to 2006, we examine the impact of institutional quality on foreign direct investment (FDI) levels and volatility. We find that good institutional quality matters to FDI. We provide evidence that institutional quality has a positive and significant effect on FDI. More specifically, we find that a one standard deviation change in institutional quality improves FDI by a factor of 1.69. Ceteris paribus, institutional quality is negatively and significantly associated with FDI volatility which may have an adverse effect on economic growth per Lensink and Morrisey (2006). Thus, our results suggest that if there are institutional determinants of FDI volatility and if such volatility is associated with lower economic growth, then the usual policy prescription of attracting FDI into countries by offering the “correct” macroeconomic environment would be ineffective without an equal emphasis on institutional reform. ► We examine the impact of institutional quality on FDI levels and volatility. ► A panel data analysis of 164 countries from 1996 to 2006 is used. ► Institutional quality has a positive and significant effect on FDI. ► A one standard deviation change improves FDI by a factor of 1.69. ► Institutional quality is negatively and significantly associated with FDI volatility.
ISSN:1057-5219
1873-8079
DOI:10.1016/j.irfa.2011.10.001