Foreword: Board of Education v. Rowley After Thirty Years
The first three contributions look at recent developments in education law and question whether and how these changes do- or should- affect Rowley's application in the future. _ Andrea Kaufman, a lawyer who is a professor at the DePaul University School of Education, and Evan Blewett, a DePaul...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of law & education 2012-01, Vol.41 (1), p.1 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The first three contributions look at recent developments in education law and question whether and how these changes do- or should- affect Rowley's application in the future. _ Andrea Kaufman, a lawyer who is a professor at the DePaul University School of Education, and Evan Blewett, a DePaul law student, observe a change in emphasis in Congress's approach to education since the passage of the original federal special education law, which they identify as a transition from ensuring basic access to improving academic performance. [...] it contends that various competing approaches may be better from an interpretive and policy perspective than the some-benefit standard; among those would be the proportional-maximization-of-opportunity standard adopted by the lower courts in Rowley. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0275-6072 |