Single-Event Charge Collection and Upset in 40-nm Dual- and Triple-Well Bulk CMOS SRAMs

CMOS technologies can be either dual-well or triple-well. Triple-well technology has several advantages compared to dual-well technology in terms of electrical performance. Differences in the ion-induced single-event response between these two technology options, however, are not well understood. Th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on nuclear science 2011-12, Vol.58 (6), p.2761-2767
Hauptverfasser: Chatterjee, I., Narasimham, B., Mahatme, N. N., Bhuva, B. L., Schrimpf, R. D., Wang, J. K., Bartz, B., Pitta, E., Buer, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:CMOS technologies can be either dual-well or triple-well. Triple-well technology has several advantages compared to dual-well technology in terms of electrical performance. Differences in the ion-induced single-event response between these two technology options, however, are not well understood. This paper presents a comparative analysis of heavy ion-induced upsets in dual-well and triple-well 40-nm CMOS SRAMs. Primary factors affecting the charge-collection mechanisms for a wide range of particle energies are investigated, showing that triple-well technologies are more vulnerable to low-LET particles, while dual-well technologies are more vulnerable to high-LET particles. For the triple-well technology, charge confinement and multiple-transistor charge collection triggers the "Single Event Upset Reversal" mechanism that reduces sensitivity at higher LETs.
ISSN:0018-9499
1558-1578
DOI:10.1109/TNS.2011.2172817