Comparison of Conductive Fabric Electrode With Electromyography to Evaluate Knee Joint Movement
This paper describes a conductive fabric electrode which includes much more surface area compared to an Ag/AgCl electrode using a bioimpedance measurement method and compares a conductive fabric electrode with electromyography to evaluate knee joint movement. Both bioimpedance changes and EMG from 1...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE sensors journal 2012-02, Vol.12 (2), p.410-411 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This paper describes a conductive fabric electrode which includes much more surface area compared to an Ag/AgCl electrode using a bioimpedance measurement method and compares a conductive fabric electrode with electromyography to evaluate knee joint movement. Both bioimpedance changes and EMG from 15 subjects were reliable as their values exist within ±1.96 STD. The coefficient of variation from bioimpedance changes was 0.07 and the coefficient of variation from EMG was 0.33. As a result, for viewing in joint angles to estimate knee joint movements, a bioimpedance measurement method using a conductive fabric electrode was more sensitive than electromyography. In addition, a conductive fabric electrode is more effective to impedance changes than an Ag/AgCl electrode. Moreover, while an Ag/AgCl electrode cannot be used continuously, as the electrodes are designed to be disposable, a conductive fabric electrode is feasible for continuous use. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1530-437X 1558-1748 |
DOI: | 10.1109/JSEN.2011.2161076 |